Re:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... -sal-khan/
"An ‘education legend’ has created an AI that will change your mind about AI"
"For Khan, the new era is bittersweet. He has created a model for responsible AI - a chain that requires
AI software makers to be humble and collaborative; subject experts to do rigorous testing and customization;
and government entities to be responsible but open-minded. But in transitioning his life’s work to AI,
he’s confronting his own obsolescence."

Now, in retirement (they say), "obsolescence" is not so threatening ... as long as
meaningful busyness continues, sufficiently funded. Perhaps AI (if government sponsored)
will soon provide optional guidance to make obsolescence a mansion world adventure.
Who knew? that AI's prediction expertise is already so future-oriented:
Re:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... alculator/
"A new AI predicts when we’ll die. It says even more about how we live."

This AI, especially as video, could highlight one's total Urantia adventure with the closing bon voyage
"The events of time and the struggles of material existence are but the transient scaffolding which bridges
over to the other side, to the promised land of spiritual reality and supernal existence." (32:5.2)
Future AI should also be able to predict when another related mortal will arrive to start the Urantia adventure.
And if they're not impressed with the AI itinerary might choose a direct flight to Mansonia. But I digress.

Re:
https://www.york.ac.uk/physics-engineer ... pple-tree/
"The first written account appears in notes on Newton's life collected by John Conduitt in 1726,
the year of Newton's death. It states that: 'he first thought of his system of gravitation which
he hit upon by observing an apple fall from a tree'. The event occurred in late summer of 1666."

Suggests a "Schrödinger's Apple" experiment to contrast human intelligence with that of AI:
Place an AI device under a similar apple tree where an apple falls. Let the device have hearing
and seeing functionality, requesting it to keep reporting on its observations, but not instructing
it about the test. Does it discover universal gravitation by observing the apple (intelligence is alive)
or does it simply report that an apple fell (intelligence is not yet alive)?
Obviously, AI will need lotsa guidance (and petabytes of data) to experience Newton's discovery
... intellectually. And still, this AI will not experience the human emotions of that discovery.
Rod
