Re:
https://www.makeuseof.com/is-ai-generated-art-real-art/
"Should AI-Generated Art Be Considered Real Art?"

A good article that declares AI art is indeed real art; not human creativity like the past but still "art"
Related to modern era art expression: I recently saw a tall man (not child) in a store with the back of his pants well below his butt. Since this youthful sagging pants era is ending, this adult stylin' still hints of art expression, albeit post trend, suggesting real art has no limits!
[from the internet] "Fashion is (also) performance art",
therefore sagging pants is stylin' performance.
See also:
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/us/saggi ... s-era-over
"The fall of the sagging pants era is upon us"

Apparent bottom line about AI art ...
Human-crafted art is unique and not easily duplicated. AI art, because of pre-existing images that are modified by text input to the AI software, is less difficult to reproduce (just input the same commands). Of course, if the pre-existing image archive keeps changing, the AI art created by these commands may change also (just backup your work)
... which is not to say that AI art is not real art - it's just not long-traditional human creativity (that started with cave paintings?).

However, the technology parallel to AI is now obvious ...
When paper was invented, most cave artists resisted, saying "What's this 'pay per' thing

Pay by the sheet
... when cave walls are free

... much larger

... more natural

... and drawings last thousands of years
... according to the manufacturer."
Rod
