Re:
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.ph ... o-abortion
"SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS 'ROE V. WADE' - No federal constitutional Right to Abortion"
![scratch :scratch:](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif)
Makes sense! Right or wrong, abortion is not a constitution issue,
but "right to life" is, especially when life might be threatened
by overreaching government policy (a constitution is supposed
to promote and preserve the necessary critical balance).
![study :study:](./images/smilies/icon_study.gif)
Re:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-sup ... 022-06-24/
"As a result of Friday's ruling, 'from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of.
A state can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs' "
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Since "familial costs" are certain for young women and children living at home,
fairness hints that the parents of the young man/boy who impregnated the girl
should also be forced to share those costs (including subsequent child raising).
After all, "It takes a village ..." said a well-known author.
Note: State law will now determine the rules for its residents.
![study :study:](./images/smilies/icon_study.gif)
Re:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4073744/posts
"Rep. Maxine Waters to Protesters: 'The Hell With the Supreme Court, We Will Defy Them' "
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Surprisingly (or not), there's significant support for abortion,
oft promoted as women's right to control their bodies.
States that permit abortion already seem destined to be the centers
providing these services with "underground" access for privacy.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
In a world so overpopulated (re: 'depopulation' conspiracy theories),
that abortion remains so controversial oft seems oxymoronic.
Mysteriously, conspiracy theory suggests that ending adult life
is the better solution than terminating beginning life.
Rod
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)