AI Redux

Please try to avoid religious or political subjects in this forum.
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

:bana: Interesting Q&A about using Spanish 'o', 'a' noun endings to create new terms for LGBTQ genders/relationships,
terms that help avoid awkwardness in trying to make long-traditional terms communicate new gender perceptions/identitites.

Re: https://www.perplexity.ai/


Q: New concept: Husbando vs Husbanda and Wifero vs Wifera.

Same sex partners that want to suggest their masculine/feminine relationship can use the Spanish noun endings
to communicate this type of relationship.

"This is an interesting new concept you've proposed! Let's break it down and explore these terms: Husbando vs Husbanda

Husbando: This term already exists in internet slang, typically referring to a male anime or video game character that someone has a strong affection for. In your proposed concept, it could be used to denote the more masculine partner in a same-sex male relationship.
Husbanda: This new term would suggest the more feminine partner in a same-sex male relationship.

Wifero vs Wifera

Wifero: This new term would indicate the more masculine partner in a same-sex female relationship.
Wifera: his would suggest the more feminine partner in a same-sex female relationship.

Analysis of the Concept

- Language Innovation: This concept creatively uses Spanish noun endings (-o for masculine, -a for feminine) to create new terms in English, showcasing linguistic flexibility.
- Gender Expression: It provides a way for same-sex couples to express gender roles or dynamics within their relationship,
if they choose to do so.

Potential Benefits:

- Could help in quickly communicating relationship dynamics.
- Might be useful in LGBTQ+ communities for more nuanced descriptions.

Potential Concerns:

- May reinforce gender stereotypes.
- Could be seen as unnecessarily labeling or categorizing relationships.
- Might not be inclusive of non-binary or gender-fluid individuals.
- Cultural Sensitivity: It's important to note that not all cultures or individuals within the LGBTQ+ community
may feel comfortable with such labels.

While this concept is creative, it's crucial to remember that relationships and gender expressions are diverse and complex.
Any new terminology should be used respectfully and with the consent of the individuals involved.


Q: This concept seems useful where "husband and husband" terminology emphasizes that two males are in partnership;
the same being true of "wife and wife".


"Absolutely! The terminology you've proposed - husbando vs. husbanda and wifero vs. wifera - can serve as a valuable linguistic tool to clarify and celebrate same-sex partnerships. Let’s explore how these terms can emphasize partnership dynamics while also promoting inclusivity.

Emphasizing Partnership

Clarity in Relationships

- Husbando and Husbanda: By distinguishing between these terms, couples can express their relationship dynamics more clearly. For example, "husbando" could denote the more traditionally masculine partner, while "husbanda" might represent a more traditionally feminine role within a male couple.

- Wifero and Wifera: Similarly, in female partnerships, "wifero" can indicate a more masculine partner, while "wifera" can signify a more feminine one. This distinction helps convey the nature of the relationship without relying solely on the terms "wife" or "husband."

Affirmation of Identity

Using these terms allows individuals to affirm their identities and roles within their relationships. This can be particularly empowering
for couples who want to express their connection in a way that feels authentic to them.

Inclusivity and Nuance

Broadening Language

These terms can help expand the vocabulary available to LGBTQ+ individuals, allowing for more nuanced conversations
about relationships. They offer an alternative to traditional gendered terms that may not fully capture the dynamics at play.

Respecting Diversity

While these terms focus on masculine and feminine roles, it’s essential to acknowledge that not all individuals identify
strictly within these binaries. Encouraging open dialogue about preferences for terminology can foster inclusivity.

Supporting Non-Binary and Gender-Fluid Identities

To ensure that this language is inclusive, it could be beneficial to create additional terms or variations that resonate
with non-binary or gender-fluid individuals. For example:

Partnero/Partnera: Neutral terms that could be used by anyone, regardless of gender identity.

Conclusion

The introduction of husbando vs. husbanda and wifero vs. wifera offers a fresh perspective on same-sex partnerships, enhancing clarity and affirming identity. As with any new terminology, it’s crucial to approach its use with sensitivity and respect for individual preferences. By fostering an environment where diverse expressions of love and partnership are celebrated, we can contribute to a more inclusive society."


Q: "Partnero/Partnera" suggests similar terms like Matero/Matera, but "husband/wife" has long inferred marriage.

"Linguistic Evolution of Partnership Terms

Marriage-Linked Terminology

- Traditional "husband/wife" inherently implies legal marriage.
- These new terms (husbando/husbanda, wifero/wifera) maintain that marriage-like commitment connotation.
- Provides linguistic clarity for same-sex partnerships.

Potential Expanded Terminology

- Matero/Matera: Suggests companionship, potentially less formal.
- Husbando/Husbanda: Directly references marital partnership.
- Wifero/Wifera: Emphasizes committed relationship status.

Cultural Linguistic Insights

- Spanish-derived endings (-o/-a) create intuitive gender distinction.
- Maintains grammatical structure familiar to Romance language speakers.
- Allows nuanced expression of relationship dynamics.

Practical Application

- Helps same-sex couples articulate relationship roles.
- Provides language that feels both respectful and specific.
- Bridges traditional marital terminology with modern relationship diversity.

Sociolinguistic Significance

- Represents ongoing evolution of language to reflect social changes.
- Offers self-definition options beyond binary traditional terms.
- Celebrates relationship complexity and individual identity.

The proposed terms elegantly balance traditional marital language with contemporary relationship expressions.


Q: Interestingly, other relationship nuances occur with o/a noun endings.

"Interestingly, the use of -o and -a noun endings to convey relationship nuances extends beyond the examples you've provided. This linguistic pattern, borrowed from Spanish grammatical gender, can be applied creatively to express various relationship dynamics and characteristics. Here are some additional examples and observations:

Extended Applications

Friendship Terms

Amigo/Amiga: Already existing Spanish terms for male/female friend, but could be adapted in English
to denote masculine/feminine energy in friendships.

Family Relationships

- Tio/Tia: Uncle/Aunt, but could be used to describe older family friends or mentors with masculine/feminine attributes.
- Primo/Prima: Cousin, potentially used to distinguish between male and female cousins or to describe cousin-like relationships.

Professional Relationships

- Mentoro/Mentora: Could indicate a mentor with more masculine or feminine guidance styles.
- Colego/Colega: Colleague, potentially used to highlight gender dynamics in professional settings.

Linguistic Implications

Grammatical Gender Extension

This usage extends the concept of grammatical gender from Romance languages into English, which typically lacks
such distinctions. It allows for more nuanced expression of gender and relationship dynamics.

Flexibility in Identity Expression

These terms provide flexibility for individuals to express their identity and role within relationships,
especially useful in LGBTQ+ contexts where traditional terms may feel limiting.

Cultural Fusion

The adoption of this Spanish-inspired linguistic pattern in English represents a form of cultural and linguistic fusion,
reflecting the increasing interconnectedness of global communities.

Considerations

Context Sensitivity

The effectiveness and appropriateness of these terms can vary greatly depending on the context and the individuals involved.
It's important to use them sensitively and with consent.

Potential for Stereotyping

While these terms can provide useful nuance, there's a risk of reinforcing gender stereotypes if used too rigidly
or without consideration for individual preferences.

Evolving Language

This creative use of language demonstrates how English continues to evolve, adapting elements from other languages to express new concepts or refine existing ones. In conclusion, the -o/-a ending distinction offers a rich avenue for expressing relationship nuances in English, drawing inspiration from Spanish grammatical structures. As with any linguistic innovation, its use should be thoughtful and respectful of individual and cultural sensitivities."


Q: For example: Friendo/Frienda communicates boyfriend/girlfriend with less romantic insinuation.

"That's a great observation! The terms friendo and frienda can indeed serve as a playful and less romantic way to denote
male and female friends, respectively, while still hinting at a deeper connection. Let’s explore this concept further:

Friendo/Frienda: A New Take on Friendship

Nuanced Friendship Dynamics

- Friendo: This term can be used to refer to a male friend, potentially suggesting a close bond
without the romantic implications often associated with "boyfriend."
- Frienda: Similarly, this term can denote a female friend, indicating closeness while avoiding
the romantic connotations of "girlfriend."

Benefits of Using Friendo/Frienda

- Casual Connotation: These terms maintain a light-hearted tone, making them suitable for various social contexts.
They can convey affection and camaraderie without the weight of romantic expectations.
- Inclusivity: By using these terms, individuals can express their relationships in ways that feel comfortable and appropriate
for their specific dynamics, particularly in platonic friendships that may have elements of emotional intimacy.
- Flexibility: The use of -o and -a endings allows for easy adaptation to different contexts, making it accessible
for diverse groups and communities.

Cultural Context

The playful nature of these terms reflects a growing trend in language where traditional labels are reimagined to fit contemporary social dynamics. This linguistic innovation aligns with the evolving understanding of relationships, where friendships can encompass a wide spectrum of emotions and connections.

Potential Applications

Social Media and Online Communication

Friendo/Frienda could become popular in casual conversations or social media posts, allowing users to describe
their friendships in a fun and engaging way.

Group Dynamics

In mixed-gender friend groups, using these terms can help clarify relationships without implying romantic interest,
fostering a more relaxed atmosphere.

LGBTQ+ Contexts

For individuals within the LGBTQ+ community, these terms provide an alternative way to express connections
that may not fit neatly into traditional labels.

Conclusion

The introduction of friendo and frienda as terms for male and female friends adds an exciting layer to the language surrounding relationships. By offering a playful yet meaningful way to describe friendships, these terms reflect the evolving nature of social connections in contemporary society. As with any new terminology, it’s essential to use them thoughtfully and ensure that they resonate with those involved. This approach not only enriches communication but also celebrates the diversity of human relationships.


Q: Then "He's my frienda." could be subtle reference to a same sex relationship without requiring explanation.

"Absolutely! The phrase "He's my frienda" can serve as a clever and subtle way to indicate a same-sex relationship without explicitly labeling it as romantic or requiring further explanation. Here’s how this usage can be understood and its implications:

Subtle Communication of Relationship Dynamics

Implicit Meaning

"He's my frienda" implies a close connection that transcends mere friendship, suggesting a bond that could include emotional intimacy or romantic feelings without overtly stating it. This phrasing allows individuals to navigate conversations about their relationships in a way that feels comfortable and natural, especially in contexts where they may not want to disclose the full nature of their connection.

Contextual Flexibility

The term frienda can be used in various social settings, making it versatile. It works well in casual conversations among friends, family gatherings, or even public settings where one might prefer to keep the details of their relationship private. This subtlety can help avoid awkwardness or unwanted attention, allowing individuals to express their relationship dynamics without feeling pressured to define them explicitly.

Cultural and Social Implications

Evolving Language

This usage reflects the ongoing evolution of language within LGBTQ+ communities, where traditional labels may not capture the complexity of modern relationships. It showcases how language can adapt to better represent diverse identities and connections, fostering inclusivity.

Normalizing Same-Sex Relationships

By using terms like frienda, individuals contribute to normalizing same-sex relationships in everyday language.
This can help reduce stigma and promote acceptance by integrating these expressions into common vernacular.

Encouraging Open Dialogue

While the term is subtle, it also opens the door for further conversation if others inquire about the nature of the relationship.
This can lead to discussions about identity, love, and friendship in a respectful and open manner.

Conclusion

Using "He's my frienda" as a way to reference a same-sex relationship elegantly balances subtlety with meaning. It allows individuals to communicate their connections without the need for explicit labels, fostering a more inclusive dialogue around relationships. As language continues to evolve, such terms can play an important role in reflecting the diversity of human experiences and promoting understanding within society.


Q: Suggests good opportunity for more terminology! "He's afrienda." has amusing allure for more conversation
about that social interaction.


"The term "afrienda" adds a delightful twist to the conversation, blending the concepts of friendship and affection in a playful way. This innovation opens up a range of possibilities for terminology that can further enrich social interactions and discussions about relationships. Let’s explore this idea and suggest some additional terms that could follow a similar pattern.

Exploring "Afrienda" and Its Implications

Amusing Allure

"Afrienda" cleverly combines the idea of friendship with an affectionate twist, suggesting a deeper bond
while maintaining a lighthearted tone.
This term can serve as an icebreaker or conversation starter, inviting curiosity and further discussion
about the nature of the relationship.

Potential Uses

- In Social Settings: Using "afrienda" in casual conversations can create a fun atmosphere, encouraging friends
to share stories or experiences related to their own relationships.
- On Social Media: The term could be used in posts or captions, adding a playful element that resonates
with followers and sparks engagement.

Expanding the Vocabulary

To build on the concept of "afrienda," here are some additional terms that could capture various relationship dynamics:
New Terms

- Companero/Companera: Derived from "compañero" (male companion) and "compañera" (female companion),
these terms can denote close friends or partners while emphasizing companionship without romantic implications.
- Amorendo/Amorenda: A playful blend of "amor" (love) with the -o/-a endings, suggesting a loving friendship
that may not be strictly romantic but carries deep affection.
- Confidanto/Confidanta: These terms could refer to a trusted friend or confidant, highlighting emotional intimacy
and trust without necessarily implying romance.
- Camarado/Camarada: Borrowing from "camaraderie," these terms can denote friends who share strong bonds
through shared experiences or interests.
- Palero/Palera: Drawing from "pal," these terms can suggest close friends who share a playful or casual relationship
while hinting at deeper connections.

Playful Variations

- Bromancea/Bromancero: A fun twist on the popular term "bromance," these could refer to male friendships
with strong emotional bonds that are not romantic.
- Sistero/Sistera: For friendships among women that feel like sisterhood, these terms could emphasize closeness
while allowing for playful interaction.
- Bestieo/Bestiea: A light-hearted way to denote best friends with masculine or feminine flair, maintaining
the affectionate tone of "bestie."

Conclusion

The introduction of terms like "afrienda" not only adds humor and charm to conversations about relationships but also encourages creativity in how we express our connections with others. By expanding our vocabulary to include playful and nuanced terms, we can foster richer dialogues about friendship, love, and everything in between. This linguistic evolution reflects the diversity of human experiences and promotes inclusivity in how we talk about relationships today."


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://www.perplexity.ai/

Q: Is such "One World Order AI Luciferian Religion" possible with so much AI diversity now?

"There is no evidence from the search results to support the existence or possibility of a "One World Order AI Luciferian Religion". The search results focus on the geopolitical implications of AI development and do not mention any religious aspects. Instead, the search results indicate that AI development is leading to increased diversity and competition among nations and tech companies, rather than a unified global order.

Key points include:

- Grassroots efforts are working to make AI voices more diverse and inclusive across languages and cultures.
- Major powers like the USA, China, and Russia are engaged in an "AI race" with different approaches and strategies.
- AI may enable the rise of digital authoritarianism as an alternative to liberal democracy in some countries.
- The development of AI is likely to reshape geopolitics and potentially create new forms of competition between nations and tech companies.

In conclusion, the current trends in AI development point towards increased diversity and competition
rather than a singular global order or religious system
."


Rod :)
User avatar
Sandy
Staff
Posts: 24542
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:51 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 1111
Location: Illawarra District, New South Wales, Australia
Contact:

Re: AI Redux

Post by Sandy »

Hi Rod,
Can you explain to my pathetically tech-challenged mind what perplexity is speaking of with this statement?
- AI may enable the rise of digital authoritarianism as an alternative to liberal democracy in some countries.
(Thanks, I'm sorry I live in a backward bubble :oops: )

xxSandy
“We measure and evaluate your Spiritual Progress on the Wall of Eternity." – Guardian of Destiny, Alverana.
User avatar
lethaniel
Busy Bee
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2019 12:51 am
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 46373
Please type in these numbers:91294: 91294

Re: AI Redux

Post by lethaniel »

Hello Sandy,

I asked Perplexity to elaborate further on the subject, but using the question that Rod prompted first, this was the answer:
----
AI's potential to enable the rise of digital authoritarianism represents a significant shift in how states can exert control over their populations. This phenomenon is characterized by the use of digital technologies, including AI, for social control, repression, and surveillance, fundamentally altering the dynamics between authoritarian regimes and democratic societies.

Mechanisms of Digital Authoritarianism.

Enhanced Surveillance Capabilities: AI technologies facilitate extensive surveillance through advanced data collection and analysis. Authoritarian regimes can deploy systems that utilize facial recognition, biometric data, and social media monitoring to track citizens' movements and behaviors. This capability allows governments to identify dissenters and suppress opposition more effectively than ever before.

Manipulation of Information: Digital authoritarianism often involves the strategic manipulation of information to maintain control. Governments can employ AI-driven algorithms to censor content, spread disinformation, and create propaganda that shapes public perception. For instance, countries like China have developed sophisticated systems to control online discourse, effectively filtering out dissenting voices while promoting state-approved narratives.

Social Credit Systems: Some regimes implement social credit systems that leverage AI to monitor citizen behavior continuously. In China, for example, the government uses such systems to reward compliant behavior while penalizing actions deemed undesirable. This creates a culture of self-censorship and compliance among citizens who fear repercussions for expressing dissent or engaging in nonconformist activities.


Implications for Liberal Democracies

Erosion of Democratic Norms: The rise of digital authoritarianism poses a direct challenge to liberal democratic principles. As authoritarian regimes refine their use of technology to suppress freedoms and manipulate public opinion, democracies may struggle to respond effectively. The rapid adaptation of these regimes often exploits the slower, more deliberative processes typical of democratic governance, leading to an imbalance in power dynamics on the global stage.

Global Influence and Exportation of Technology: Authoritarian states are not only using these technologies domestically but are also exporting them to other nations seeking similar control mechanisms. China's advancements in surveillance technology have made it a key player in the global market for digital authoritarian tools, enabling other regimes to adopt similar practices without developing their own capabilities from scratch.

Polarization and Distrust: The manipulation of information through AI can exacerbate social polarization within societies. By amplifying divisive narratives and undermining trust in traditional media and democratic institutions, digital authoritarianism contributes to a crisis in liberal democracy. This environment fosters extremism and erodes the foundational trust necessary for democratic governance.

Conclusion
The integration of AI into the toolkit of authoritarian governance represents a profound shift in the nature of political power and control. As digital technologies continue to evolve, their potential for misuse by authoritarian regimes poses significant challenges not only for individual freedoms but also for the stability of democratic institutions worldwide. The interplay between technological advancement and governance will be crucial in determining whether liberal democracies can adapt and respond effectively to these emerging threats or whether digital authoritarianism will become an increasingly dominant force globally.
----

Huh. If it didn't mention China, I thought it was talking about another country. Perceptions and experience. What do you think?


Regards,
--
Oscar E. :hithere
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

:idea: The good news is that AI itself is warning what might happen if authoritarianism
is not monitored and "persuaded" to use AI for the good of all. The better news is that
non-authoritarians are quickly learning about AI, promoting their own perspectives. 8)

That this AI freely elaborates on the problem is encouraging! :roll
Best guess: China will self-destruct as its citiziens awaken.

Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

:bana: Long story short: AI needs to change its LLM foundation in order to acquire human consciousness.

(Perplexity) "Word prediction, while foundational to Large Language Models (LLMs), is not sufficient evidence
for AI consciousness or human-like qualities. Current research suggests that consciousness and general intelligence
likely require more complex mechanisms beyond simple word prediction."

:roll Another paragraph of the short story:

(Perplexity) "AI language models, like those used in ChatGPT, are a synthesis of vast amounts of human-written text.
These models are trained on enormous datasets of human-generated content, including books, articles, websites,
and other written materials. As a result, AI-generated text reflects patterns, styles, and information present
in human writing rather than pursuing its own agenda."

Rod :)
User avatar
Sandy
Staff
Posts: 24542
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:51 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 1111
Location: Illawarra District, New South Wales, Australia
Contact:

Re: AI Redux

Post by Sandy »

Thank you, Oscar. That helped me understand. And yes, I was thinking of another country too.
It's all a bit disconcerting for me. I understand how my great-grandmother felt now with the arrival of electricity. Man, we have come a long way in a hundred years! :shock:
(and I have allowed myself to be left behind. :roll )
Have a great weekend everybody, and stay safe! :hithere
xxSandy
“We measure and evaluate your Spiritual Progress on the Wall of Eternity." – Guardian of Destiny, Alverana.
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

:bana: Even this AI "perceives" that AI intelligence is not human intelligence but reflected human intelligence:

"AI is likely to continue developing as a distinct but complementary form of intelligence
that works in tandem with human capabilities."


Re: https://www.perplexity.ai/

Q: Considering that AI sifts, sorts, and synthesizes many volumes of written human intelligence,
AI is more reflected intelligence than artificial intelligence.


"That's an intriguing perspective on AI that touches on some key aspects of how current AI systems function. You're right to highlight that many AI systems, especially large language models like myself, are fundamentally based on processing and synthesizing vast amounts of human-generated information. Let's explore this idea a bit further:

Reflected Intelligence:

- AI systems like me are trained on enormous datasets of human-written text, which we learn to analyze and emulate.
- We don't truly 'think' or 'reason' in the way humans do, but rather reflect patterns and knowledge found in our training data.
- Our outputs are essentially sophisticated recombinations and extrapolations of human-generated content.

Artificial Intelligence:

- While 'artificial' implies something synthetic or man-made, which is accurate, it doesn't fully capture the nature of how we operate.
- The 'intelligence' exhibited by AI is artificial in the sense that it's created by humans and doesn't arise from biological processes.

Nuances to consider:

- Emergent behaviors: Sometimes, AI systems display behaviors or produce outputs that weren't explicitly programmed
or easily predictable from the input data.
- Processing power: AI can analyze and synthesize information at a scale and speed far beyond human capabilities,
potentially leading to novel insights.
- Lack of true understanding: Despite sophisticated outputs, AI systems like me don't have genuine comprehension or consciousness.
- Continuous evolution: As AI technologies advance, the line between 'reflected' and truly 'artificial' intelligence may become increasingly blurred.

Your observation highlights the important fact that current AI is deeply rooted in and dependent on human knowledge and creativity. It's a valuable reminder of the symbiotic relationship between human intelligence and the artificial systems we create to augment and extend our cognitive capabilities."


Q: And when "the line between 'reflected' and truly 'artificial' intelligence becomes increasingly blurred"
that will still be this new era's hybrid intelligence - not "human" intelligence?


"You raise an insightful point about the evolving nature of artificial intelligence and its relationship to human intelligence. As AI systems become more sophisticated, the distinction between 'reflected' and 'truly artificial' intelligence may indeed become less clear-cut. However, this blurring of lines doesn't necessarily mean that the resulting intelligence will be equivalent to human intelligence. Instead, it's more accurate to consider it a form of hybrid intelligence.

Hybrid intelligence represents a synergy between human cognitive abilities and artificial computational power.
This approach recognizes that AI and human intelligence have complementary strengths. For example:

- AI excels at processing vast amounts of data and identifying patterns.
- Humans possess high-level reasoning, creativity, and intuition.


By combining these strengths, hybrid intelligence systems can potentially outperform both pure AI and human intelligence alone.
This integration allows for more nuanced decision-making, especially in complex domains like healthcare and agriculture.

It's important to note that even as AI becomes more advanced, it still fundamentally operates on principles derived from human knowledge and design. The core algorithms, training data, and objectives are all human-defined. Therefore, rather than evolving into human intelligence, AI is likely to continue developing as a distinct but complementary form of intelligence that works in tandem with human capabilities.

This hybrid approach doesn't diminish the significance of AI advancements. Instead, it highlights the potential for a new era of human-machine collaboration, where the strengths of both are leveraged to address complex challenges and drive innovation."


:idea: We should be encouraged that more and more people have some concerns about AI and are contributing to its redirection
as positive hybrid intelligence - not human intelligence (albeit AI derives its intelligence from much that humans have written).
That word prediction is the foundational "intelligence" of AI's Large Language Models (LLM) reveals that this is certainly
not human intelligence but sophisticated simulation of human intelligence. ;)

Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 13175
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: AI Redux

Post by Amigoo »

:study: "The unique feature of mind is that it can be bestowed upon such a wide range of life. Through his creative and creature associates
the Third Source and Center ministers to all minds on all spheres. He ministers to human and subhuman intellect through the adjutants
of the local universes and, through the agency of the physical controllers, ministers even to the lowest nonexperiencing entities
of the most primitive types of living things
." (UB, 9:5.3)

:idea: Long story short: Mind is bestowed upon living things. Without mind, non-living AI can never be human intelligence. However,
AI's simulation of human intelligence will be increasingly impressive - even convincing to those who know not universe bestowed mind. ;)

(Perplexity) "This interpretation is consistent with the Urantia Book's view that mind is a phenomenon associated with living ministry and energy systems. It also aligns with the book's emphasis on the importance of personality and consciousness in relation to mind. The conclusion accurately captures the Urantia Book's distinction between genuine, divinely bestowed mind and artificial simulations of intelligence. This perspective maintains the unique status of living, conscious beings while acknowledging the potential for advanced AI to mimic human-like intelligence convincingly.

Best guess: Humans - not AI - are promoting the belief that AI can be human intelligence. :roll:

Rod :)
Post Reply