Hello Eric and everyone,
Yes, I would like to join the Zoom call, sounds great. I'm going to make it happen somehow (sounds like moving a mountain of some sorts).
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
I actually came here to report that I am likely not going to attend this week- I am taking a little break from all my Zoom call connectivity(here and elsewhere) and picking things back up next week. I did not meditate yesterday with the group either, instead, I opted in for a bowl of frozen fruit(sliced bananas) and some fresh blackberries as I watched mind numbing television.

The Cancerian male in me must be recharging in its typical fashion- a bit hermit like in nature~
I have met quite a few people like us, that need time just doing 'nothing' into existence. I believe that was a comedian (don't remember which one), that said, that men have a box in their minds with nothing in it. We just like, from time to time, just be. Although for me it's a couple times a year.
About this one:
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
What you speculate is fascinating. Jon and I actually got to touch up on the subject a little bit in last weeks chat. I have a feeling that I *chose to come here. I remember having awareness in the womb. Or... The experience was, that I* whatever constitutes the I* exist, as formless awareness... Somehow suspended in this blackness aware of *itself. Apparently I spent a lot of time in the womb, so much so that any longer and it would have been life threatening to my Mother and they had to perform an emergency C-section. What a trip.
I do remember parts of being in my mothers' womb. She would be talking about "Simón Bolívar" the south american liberator, or just hearing how she would laugh out loud. I don't quite understood it back then, but dream about it later and then understood.
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
I think you're right, we have access to genetic history. What I was theorizing with Jon is that it's quite possible we chose our blood line on a soul level in order to help heal the genetic lineage. Does it sound crazy? Maybe to some. . . But I don't think such an idea is to far off from the reality of our *being here. At least for me, it has served a purpose.
Some people believe that we choose our life and everything into it (money, partners, friends, country, even how we die) before coming into this world. Even the world is chosen. This sounds interesting, because all our worries would be for nothing. If the choice has been made, why worry? And yet, before knowing anything about where we are now (Ubook, Celestials, TA...), we couldn't just be aware of the 'coincidences' that were headed our way. So choice in this life, has a saying. Everything might be set, but one can choose to ignore, willingly or just not there yet, so the possibilities actually multiple by several, on how life is carried. Cool isn't? This life, it's just full of possible choices.
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
So, we're supposed to dive into Paper 1 this Friday. And I want to re-read it because it is very interesting. If you have anything you'd like to share about it, please post here. What is your favorite part of Paper 1? That could be a good start, what does it mean to you?
I believe ten posts couldn't fit about my favourite parts about the Universal Father. Like Jesus, I just love talking about our Father in Heavens. But I'll try to humor you. There are tons of things I like from Paper 1. But If I were to choose, is that there is an Universal Father. You see, in every religion (I'm catholic, still would be, even if I don't agree), they talk about God. "If you don't do God's will, then this, then that..." I didn't grow up into fearing God, but this notion always seemed weird to me. Nobody talks about our Universal Father. So for Universal Father to be introduced before anything else just shook every roots of myself. And not because what I found in Paper 1, but what came afterwards. If there is an Universal Father, Who created anything and everything, so everyone and everything is somehow family. This was the first thing that came into mind and heart. But later, it just evolved, we are more than family, as you said, we are all part of One and the same. To actually hurt another person it's like shooting oneself in the foot.
The second part of Paper 1 that I loved is the comment at the end: "I portray the reality and truth of the Father’s nature and attributes with unchallengeable authority; I know whereof I speak." I know lots of things in my career. I know my 1 + 1 = 2, but even I know lots of things, I would never say something like this. Don't get me wrong, I can answer to my profession if needed when asked (we all study for that), but to actually go and say, 'I know what I'm talking about', that is not going to happen, because I consider myself always a student. Even if I master certain subjects, when passing this knowledge, I'm always learning from those who benefit.
This one is interesting:
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
One thing I think I may have also mentioned to Jon regarding paper 1 is this... And now that I'm typing it may come out a little more elaborate- but God is described as a He and often. I personally believe God is a He* a She* and all the known definitions of what we could ever produce describing God. Father, Mother, Brother, Sister, Child, Stranger, Friend, Love, Enemy... ALL GOD. That is my belief. I wonder if the book is continually calling God a He because that is most aligned with the information already present within the sleeping subject? Though I can't physically see God- I often have felt the energy of a presence that is not actually male or female. And sometimes it's either or. My *friend on the other side* those beings more intelligent than this little me... I have called Mother. Not Father. I have also come to know 14 as a friend, a jokester, and a divine Female and divine Male figure... How could 14 be all these things? Well.
I believe Universal Father in Paper 1, as the First Source and Center of all Creation. If I keep saying the Universal Father, you know that I'm actually talking about Him. But as Jon says, it is your choice as you refer to God. If you translate to Spanish "The First Source and Center", you get: "La Primera Fuente" (Female) "y Centro" (Male). Perhaps this is some sort of advantage in language, but you could say that is both. There is much in the UBook about this, for instance Jesus, came to portray the aspects of that ALL GOD, and came always talking about the Father. In a world where males mistreat females, a Loving Father above all, makes quite sense. But we would be getting way ahead of ourselves in the UBook.
Just remembered some dear One to us in this one:
happyrain wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:32 pm
The Peacock Angel is considered an androgynous being neither male or female but having risen through duality this Being contains both archetypes. Does it make sense? What's your take on all that... ? The Peacock Angel is also considered the first, "Deviation" or "Creation" of God in various cultures. We don't have to get so hung up on the origin stories... I'm just sharing to make the point, some of the more advanced beings aren't necessarily a He or a She as we know it. So why is God considered a *He most assuredly through out the UBook?
I don't completely recall, if it was in one of George's books, but at first he couldn't see Primary Midwayer Andrea. When he did saw Andrea, he saw a Being with beard and breasts. I think you can actually make faces in the spirit world, or kind of send the wrong message, but I think he was startled to find out that that androgynous beings exists. I believe George later had to apologise. I didn't know him that well, Sandy might have more on this. But I've read his books, and I found the most easygoing person. So the shock was something great.
When we are in our mother's womb, at some point, we are androgynous. In seventh to eighth week thinks start to change. But before that, you can see that a female and a male are almost exactly the same. God is Love and Light. So why bother with male and female in the UBook? We, by choice, are from a plane which is consider the lowest starting point in Creation. To actually look up to God, we have to do it in our perspective, even if it's not accurate for everyone. So why God doesn't state it bluntly ? Because God only know two types of people: Those who love God because they know God, and those who don't love God because they don't know God. (See what I did there?)
I bet God's smiling right now, because words just don't cut it. It is still your choice. I know women who heard their T.A. and it is a soft male voice. I also know men who hear a very soft kind of female voice. There is also the soft male and female voices for males and females respectively.
There are some cultures that state we both have a male and female minds. Logic and intuition? This is for you to explore. Keep on meditating, you eventually grow into it.
Regards!