Page 2 of 2

Re: 10:10:10 has arrived

Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:18 pm
by wirelessguru1
George wrote:Add to that the Angelic and Melchizedek Minds, we have ourselves a digital mind soup to truly confuse ourselves.
No confusion coming from the one (1) here, only "clarifications". 8)

+1 (Neo)

Re: 10:10:10 has arrived

Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:47 pm
by Geoff
wirelessguru1 wrote:Well Geoff and yet again: F= 1/T

where:

F = Frequency of an EM wave

and:

T = Time (period of the EM wave)

So frequency (F) is the inverse of time (T). Feel free to check it out.
You still don't get it. That's the measurement of time, it's not time itself. Let me have all your money, and I will keep you apprised of the quantity. That's the same analogy. But I can see we are not going to get anywhere.

take care,
Geoff

Re: 10:10:10 has arrived

Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:24 am
by wirelessguru1
Of course it is time itself and frequency itself on that inverse relationship...and that is simply because space itself is just a wavelength.