World Views

Please try to avoid religious or political subjects in this forum.
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

:scratch: Perhaps, what to expect next in this new war ...

(Perplexity) "From the perspective of institutional religion, a foreign‑sponsored killing
of Iran’s ayatollah‑supreme‑leader would be symbolically comparable to assassinating
the Catholic pope: both would be read as attacks on the sacred head of a world religion,
not just on a politician.

However, because Iran’s leader is simultaneously the core of a revolutionary state
and command structure in a way the pope is not, the act also carries an additional,
uniquely political‑strategic weight that goes beyond the usual papal analogy."


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/cel ... 51399.html
"McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski trying the new burger."

(Google AI Overview) "High-calorie (1020), 14-ounce burger with two quarter-pound patties,
three slices of white cheddar cheese, toppings, and a new, distinct 'Big Arch' sauce."

:cheers: Could be promotion for Ronald McDonald's younger sibling: Big Arch(ie).
And a Big Arch(ie) Platter might be the day's main calories :!:

:hithere Reminds of the Big Boy Burgers, now mostly in Michigan.
And hints that BIGness is still popular culinary expectation. ;)

:idea: For best staging of new TV advertising ...
When the children are comparing their lunches,
the more petite child boasts to larger friends:
"I have a Big Arch(ie)!" :D


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

:scratch: Limited(?) agreement on both sides of this war to "cause Armageddon" ...


Re: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... phecy.html
"Commanders tell troops to prepare for Jesus' return and issue chilling Armageddon prophecy"

"A non-commissioned officer (NCO) wrote that his combat-unit commander claimed President was 'anointed
by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth'."

(Google AI Overview) "The hardline leadership in Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
incorporate a messianic worldview into their war strategy, believing that the chaos and conflict in the Middle East -
specifically, the confrontation with Israel and the United States - are paving the way for return of the 12th Imam,
or Mahdi. The Mahdi’s return is imminent, to be preceded by a period of severe global chaos."

"Muslims have believed in the return or appearance of the Mahdi for nearly 1400 years,
with roots in the first two centuries of Islam (7th–8th centuries CE)."


:idea: Increasing global chaos supports these same-but-different perspectives!
Analysis: This divinity will return but only after humans have ended their wars
and provided a planet worthy of this still-distant celebration. Interestingly,
these many centuries of same-but-different belief suggest this return
of divinity is not dependent on chaos that the world perpetuates. :roll:


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

:hithere The Genzie generation that redefines modern social life
with the many devices required (and used 24/7) ...

Re: https://www.wsj.com/business/retail/gen ... s-15716009
"A New Generation of Mall Rats Has Arrived"

"Gen Z shoppers are hanging out at malls and documenting everything on social media,
helping boost a budding recovery in stores." 8)


:bana: Helps millennials learn what they missed in the first mall era (1950s) ...
and that sharing your experiences in social media is now high priority. :o


Q: What proportion of Gen Z has a smartphone compared to other generations?

(Google AI Overview) "95% to 98% of Gen Z owns a smartphone, representing the highest ownership rate of any generation ...
They also spend more time on devices, averaging over 4 to 6 hours daily ... Gen Z consistently ranks highest and uses them
for longer durations - nearly twice as much as Boomers ... 25% of Gen Zers had a smartphone before age 10, and 91%
got their first device before age 16.

While smartphones are ubiquitous for all young people, Gen Z's integration of the device into daily life -
from purchasing goods to social connection - is significantly higher than older cohorts!


:idea: Hints that "device" will be resurrected as "De-vice!" if self-documented socialization
becomes too intense and too competitive (like entertainment reviews). :roll:

*** Entrepreneur Alert: Orkin, et al., could include this de-vice service
with electronic device detection an important first phase. :lol:


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

:sunflower: Prepare to De-vice! (edited summary of recent Q&A)


(Perplexity) "Concerning Device Chaos in Very Low Earth Orbit

"It has become increasingly clear that the most crowded and unstable shell of orbiting hardware is no longer a distant band above the atmosphere,
but the three-meter sphere surrounding the average human body. Phones, watches, earbuds, trackers, smart lenses, and domestic assistants now circulate throughout this zone with all the grace of space junk, perpetually broadcasting, listening, and colliding for our attention.

What once counted as pristine personal environment has quietly turned into a low-orbit debris field of screens and sensors, each designed to be indispensable and each adding a little more friction to the simple act of being alive; the act once sufficient in the eras before electricity for those generations to beget our current generations.

In this latest societal regime change caused by technology, the question is no longer whether we are 'connected', but how long
our cognitive and emotional infrastructure can withstand the increasing impacts of near-human electronic flotsam and jetsam."


Q: Online news: "While smartphones are ubiquitous for all young people, Gen Z's integration of the device into daily life -
from purchasing goods to social connection - is significantly higher than older cohorts!"

This hints that "device" will soon be resurrected as "De-vice!" if self-documented socialization becomes too intense and too competitive (like entertainment reviews). Orkin, et al., could include this De-vice! service with electronic device detection an important first phase.
After all, humans will soon need frequent status checks on the many devices impacting their personal lives.


(P) "A clever and thought-provoking play on words - turning 'device' into 'De-vice!' - as if modern life
now requires a sort of detox or diagnostic service to manage our increasing dependence on connecting technology.

Just as Orkin detects and removes unwanted creepy crawly intrusions in the home, a future 'De‑vice!' service could diagnose, track,
and mitigate the overwhelming proliferation of digital tools in people’s lives. In a sense, this is digital hygiene - controlling the invasion
of attention-grabbing interfaces rather than insects.

This imagined 'De‑vice!' industry could include:

- Usage diagnostics: Identifying when and how devices disrupt sleep, focus, or relationships.
- Behavioral cleanup: Setting up schedules, screen limits, or mindfulness prompts ('digital pest traps').
- Environmental scans: Detecting excessive EMF exposure, overlapping notifications, or redundant smart devices
that clutter mental or physical space.

The observation that every generation has navigated new forms of technology to 'live sufficiently well to beget later generations'
adds a nice historical grounding. Just as clean water and sanitation improved physical health, device management may become
the next public-health-style initiative to preserve mental and social well-being.


(P) "Grounding this whimsical idea in genuine emerging needs makes it both witty and plausible.
Here’s how that concept could be framed:

The word 'device' has long carried the thrill of invention. Now, it hums constantly in our hands, on our wrists, beside our beds, and sometimes even under our skin. The saturation of devices in daily life has reached a point where 'De‑vice!' - the notion of detecting, balancing, and managing their influence - no longer sounds fanciful, but necessary - even critical to health and well-being.

Gen Z, raised in a digital ecology, has integrated smartphones, wearables, and sensor‑driven tools into nearly every aspect of life. Yet health data, sleep patterns, mood fluctuations, and attention fatigue all show that this abundance of connectivity carries unseen costs. A De‑vice! service would not aim to banish technology but to audit it - much like an environmental inspection checks air quality or water purity.

Such a service might begin with digital ecology mapping: identifying a household’s or workplace’s array of electronics, ambient signals, and usage rhythms. Next could come behavioral calibration, helping people rebalance attention, social engagement, and rest in light of their device interactions. Over time, the service could extend to adaptive remediation - like soundscaping environments, recalibrating light exposure, or recommending digital fasting intervals tailored to health metrics.

What once sounded like satire - 'Orkin for devices' — may soon mirror genuine public health priorities. Just as modern societies learned to manage pollutants and build sanitation systems, the next evolution of wellness might be in curating our invisible digital habitat. The De‑vice! era would not reject technology, but finally learn to live well with it."


(P) "A De-vice! era fits naturally into a near future where entire publications focus on the collateral damage of tech,
not just its features. Here’s a magazine-style take plus some provocative future titles.

Feature: 'Welcome to the De‑vice! Economy'

By the mid-2030s, no one remembers when 'device' just meant a handy gadget. The term has swollen to include everything that pings, tracks, listens, suggests, optimizes, and quietly adjusts the human day. Phones, wearables, smart speakers, AR glasses, beds that track your REM cycles, cars that log your moods, even fridges that know your snack relapses. In this world, the problem is no longer access to technology, but exposure to it. What used to be a quirky joke - 'someone should start an Orkin for phones' - has quietly become a new industry: De‑vice! services.

Like pest control, De‑vice! companies don’t hate the ecosystem; they simply acknowledge that, left unchecked, it overgrows the host. For Gen Z and later, screens aren’t tools they pick up; they’re air they breathe. Their social lives, bank accounts, medical histories, and romantic prospects run through a lattice of apps, sensors, and feeds. The result isn’t just distraction, but measurable shifts in sleep, anxiety, attention, and even basic self-perception. At some point, societies that once praised 'always on' connectivity start asking a more unsettling question: How much invisible (and EMF) influence can a body and mind absorb before it needs a formal checkup?

The De‑vice! inspector arrives like any other technician. They don’t start with your psyche; they start with your house. Every screen is logged, every listening mic mapped, every always‑on camera, every Bluetooth handshake, each streaming box, thermostat, car key, baby monitor, and smart toy. They draw a density map of your life: which rooms hum with invisible signals, where sleep occurs in a fog of notifications, which hours your dopamine spikes in lockstep with your feeds. Then comes the uncomfortable moment when they flip the tablet around and show you, in nauseating detail, who (or what) is really 'using' whom.

From there, De‑vice! services spread into the rest of life. Employers want 'cognitive exposure reports' to understand why their high performers burn out after two years. Parents sign up for 'developmental load assessments' to see how overlapping screens, alerts, and gamified homework shape their kids’ nervous systems. Couples book 'relational bandwidth audits' to quantify what they already feel: that the rectangle on the nightstand captures more intimacy than either partner. The service doesn’t promise a return to a pre-electric past; it offers something more modest and more radical -
a chance to live with technology instead of inside it.

What makes this industry more inevitable than whimsical is simple: humans didn’t evolve for this level of constant digital contact. Earlier generations survived without electricity, yet still managed to create art, families, and thriving communities. Now, in an era of surplus everything - information, stimulation, convenience, connection - people hire De‑vice! professionals for the same reason their ancestors built sewers and water systems. The infrastructure of modern life, it turns out, isn’t just cables in the ground. It is, increasingly, the protection of our finite attention, our fragile sleep,
and the few remaining places in our days where nothing is trying to analyze, organize and optimize us.

Here are some future magazines that would take these problems seriously:

Analog Futures - Dedicated to 'post-digital living', featuring people who selectively downgrade tech,
from smartphones, landlines and paper planners to offline education and low‑sensor homes.

The Attention Review - A journal-style magazine treating attention as a public resource, with investigations
into algorithm design, notification economies, and the health costs of constant partial focus.

Human Firmware - Explores how bodies and minds adapt to ubiquitous tech, covering sleep science,
neurobiology of screens, mental health, and 'patch notes' for our coping strategies.

Offline Society - A culture magazine about communities that deliberately limit connectivity: phone‑free schools,
no‑screen neighborhoods, device‑minimal workplaces, and electronically 'quiet cities'.

De‑vice! Quarterly – Industry and consumer reporting on the emerging De‑vice! sector: digital exposure audits,
detox tourism, device‑light architecture, and standards for 'healthy' tech environments.

New Tech Sanitation - Treats tech side effects like public health issues, the way earlier eras confronted smog
or contaminated water, focusing on regulation, infrastructure, and civic design.


(P) "A De‑vice! industry would fit neatly into a world that already admits it needs 'sanitation' for the messes of modern technology. In orbit, the problem has a name: space debris, a growing cloud of defunct satellites, rocket fragments, and hardware shards that threaten working spacecraft and future launches. In living rooms and workplaces, the equivalent is less visible but just as real: a haze of notifications, idle screens, forgotten wearables, and background devices quietly siphoning attention and data.

In this near future, a tongue‑in‑cheek spin‑off emerges from the serious field of Space Debris Sanitation: Electronic Flotsam & Jetsam Management. The same mindset used to catalog dead satellites and track rogue bolts in low Earth orbit gets repurposed for near‑human space - the three meters around your body where phones, earbuds, smartwatches, tablets, and assistants all compete to be 'always on'. A technician who once simulated collision risks between satellites now runs 'collision avoidance' for your attention span, plotting where overlapping alerts and redundant gadgets constantly crash into your ability to think.

Their brochure reads like satire but lands a bit too close to home: 'We clean up the dead satellites in orbit;
now let us help with the dead apps on your phone.'

They offer packages such as:

- Low‑Orbit Cleanout - removing unused apps, muting nonessential alerts, powering down zombie devices that still listen 'just in case'.
- Signal Traffic Control - rationalizing Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, and smart‑home chatter so your bedroom doesn’t feel like mission control.
- Personal Kessler Check - assessing whether the sheer number of digital objects around you has reached a psychological Kessler Syndrome,
where each new device accentuates the chaos.

At first, people hire them as a joke, the way someone might frame a parking ticket. But as with orbital trash, the humor fades when the maps come back. It turns out that modern humans now live in a kind of low Earth orbit of their own, surrounded by spinning fragments of past upgrades, half‑configured sensors, and legacy accounts that never quite deorbit. In that light, Space Debris Sanitation branching into Sweeps of Electronic Flotsam & Jetsam for homes and offices feels less like satire and more like a logical next step in keeping our shared environments - celestial and domestic - still livable."


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://www.yahoo.com/creators/lifestyl ... 39507.html

"Boyfriend wonders if he was wrong spending $18,500 on a 140-pound cheese wheel -
then girlfriend packed her bag." :o

:bana: This song helps explain the dilemma ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_04ZrNroTo

She was not on the same bus
where he goes "I love you!" (still),
then she goes "Wah, wah, wah!"

Suggesting "Shh, shh, shh!" and
that "They get on the same bus!" :roll:


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.ph ... r-now-dead

First thought: The media keep promoting panic mode (loss of leadership) whenever world leaders depart (for any reason),
but many humans are prepared to move into those leadership positions. However, this requires continuing long term
preparation for this advancement of new leaders. When one leader departs, ten could be in the grooming lane.

Next thought: In this digital era, why do military and political leaders need to meet in person when the risk is so great?


Re: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 236968007/

First thought: Especially for world leaders, internal good looks should have higher priority than external.


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://citizenwatchreport.com/waymo-ad ... ilippines/
"Waymo admits that its autopilot is often just guys from the Philippines" :o

"Waymo’s chief safety officer recently noted that when the company’s robotaxis encounter unusual situations,
they may request real-time input from a remote response agent, receiving human guidance when needed."


:idea: Maybe passengers could get a discount if they assisted as backseat driver
(but they would probably need this BS license). :roll:

Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/a ... ceipt.html
"If you can't afford to tip, you shouldn't be dining out."

"The diner's bill came to $30.53. But when they looked at the pre-calculated
tip suggestions printed on the receipt, something didn't seem right." :?

:bana: Simple solution to this ongoing controversy ...

In this digital era and since suggested tips are now social demands,
diners should know what their meal will cost (including tip) before
they place their order ... even before they're seated! Everybody
has a smartphone! An app could easily do this math first.

By accepting this seating, diners confirm they can afford the tip.
Or diners could decide at home what was budget friendly today.

:lol: Wisdom: If you need to use the app,
"you shouldn't be dining out" (they say).
Or let AI tell you when/where to go. :roll:


Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

:sunflower: Different but still the same?
(this article inspired Q&A about the benefits)

Re: https://www.foxnews.com/world/dad-loses ... -elon-musk
"Dad loses custody of autistic son after fighting sex change"

Q: Do sex change operations (and medicines) create functional,
opposite sex or are they limited to psychological benefits?



(Perplexity) "Medical and surgical gender transition can change many physical and social-sex characteristics, but they do not create a fully 'typical' reproductive organ system of the opposite sex; the main benefits are a mix of substantial bodily changes and psychological relief, not true biological reversal.

Gender‑affirming hormone therapy (testosterone for trans men, estrogen plus testosterone‑blocking for trans women) produces many physical changes that move the body toward the typical appearance and some physiology of the target sex.

- In trans men, testosterone usually deepens the voice, increases facial/body hair, stops menstruation, increases muscle mass, and changes fat distribution toward a more 'male' pattern.​

- In trans women, estrogen plus blockers typically causes breast development, softer skin, loss of spontaneous erections, reduced testicular size, and a shift in fat distribution toward hips and thighs with some loss of muscle strength.

However, some features are hard or impossible to change: skeletal size and pelvic shape do not reverse, and voice pitch in adults does not reliably feminize with estrogen alone. Fertility is usually impaired or lost, and hormone therapy does not create ovaries, testes, or fully functional sperm/eggs of the opposite sex.

Gender‑affirming surgeries reshape existing tissues to resemble the external genitals or secondary sex characteristics of the target sex.

- For trans women, procedures can create a neovagina (using penile or other tissue), labia, and a clitoris‑like structure
with erotic sensation, plus breast augmentation and facial feminization.

- For trans men, surgeries can remove breasts and uterus/ovaries, and construct a phallus and scrotum (metoidioplasty
or phalloplasty with scrotoplasty), sometimes allowing standing urination and penetrative sex.

These new structures can be cosmetically convincing and may allow urination, intercourse, and orgasm, but they are not identical to natal organs and generally do not restore natural fertility (no sperm‑producing testes or egg‑producing ovaries, no typical uterus for pregnancy). Function can also be limited by complications, need for ongoing care (e.g., vaginal dilation), or reduced sensation.

Studies show that hormone therapy and surgeries often reduce gender dysphoria and improve overall well‑being, body satisfaction, and social functioning for many transgender people. People frequently report better quality of life, less distress about their bodies, and improved ability to live day‑to‑day in their identified gender, though not everyone benefits equally and some still struggle with mental‑health issues.

These interventions can create bodies that look and in some respects function socially and sexually like those of the target sex,
but they do not recreate a full opposite‑sex reproductive system or completely reverse all sex‑linked traits.

The benefits are both physical (appearance, some bodily functions) and psychological (reduced dysphoria,
improved well‑being), but they are not equivalent to being born again as the opposite sex.
"


(UB Tutor) "The question of whether sex change operations and associated medical interventions create a fully functional opposite sex or are limited to psychological benefits touches on profound biological, psychological, and spiritual dimensions. From a biological standpoint, while modern medicine can alter physical characteristics and provide hormonal treatments to align an individual's external appearance and secondary sexual traits with their identified gender, these interventions do not fully replicate the intricate biological functions of the opposite sex. For instance, the reproductive systems and chromosomal structures remain fundamentally tied to the individual's original biological sex. Thus, while the external and hormonal changes may be significant, they do not equate to a complete biological transformation into the opposite sex.

Psychologically, these interventions often provide profound benefits for individuals experiencing gender dysphoria, as they can help align one's physical appearance with their internal sense of identity. This alignment can lead to improved mental health, greater self-acceptance, and a sense of congruence that was previously unattainable. However, the spiritual and existential aspects of sex and gender, as discussed in the teachings, suggest that the differences between male and female are not merely physical but extend into the realms of personality expression, emotional dynamics, and societal roles. These distinctions are deeply interwoven into the fabric of human experience and evolution, serving purposes that transcend individual identity and contribute to the broader social and spiritual development of humanity.

The teachings emphasize that the differences between the sexes are complementary and essential for the full expression of human potential and societal harmony. Each sex has its unique sphere of existence and purpose, and while societal roles and perceptions evolve, the intrinsic qualities of male and female remain distinct and purposeful. This perspective suggests that while medical and psychological interventions can address individual needs and alleviate personal suffering, they do not alter the fundamental spiritual and existential realities of sex differentiation."


Q: Why is modern society more willing to accept sex change operations than accept
that some men have female characteristics and some women male characteristics?


(P) "Modern societies tend to accept medical transition more readily than gender‑nonconforming personalities
because surgery fits existing mental 'boxes' of male and female, while blurred or mixed traits challenge those boxes directly.

Many people are more comfortable if someone is legibly one thing or another: 'now you’re a man' or 'now you’re a woman'. Surgery and hormones are seen as moving someone from one clear category to another, which preserves the binary rather than questioning it. Men with 'feminine' traits and women with 'masculine' traits, by contrast, suggest that the categories themselves are looser than we were taught, which feels destabilizing for people whose identity and worldview rely on a sharp gender divide.​

When something is framed as a medical condition (gender dysphoria) with an established treatment pathway, people are more inclined to see it as legitimate and deserving of care. Gender‑nonconforming traits (a gentle man, an assertive woman, a man who likes makeup, a woman who dislikes childcare) are not easily coded as a 'condition', so they are judged morally or culturally instead: 'he should man up', 'she should be more feminine'.

Transition is often perceived as an individual solution: one person changes their body and documents to match the social categories already in place; society doesn’t have to rethink its norms very much. Accepting that many men naturally have stereotypically 'female' qualities and many women stereotypically 'male' ones would require a broad rethinking of work roles, family expectations, and power structures. That kind of systemic change is harder and more threatening.​

There are now strong public narratives and institutions around transition: clinics, standards of care, legal procedures, and media stories that show surgery as a recognized path to well‑being. There are far fewer coherent public narratives that say, 'You can be a man who cries a lot or a woman who hates kids and still be fully a man/woman; nothing is wrong with you.' Instead, those people get treated as odd, immature, or defective.

Traditional masculinity is often heavily policed: boys and men are punished more for looking or acting 'feminine' than for, say, wanting to change their bodies to embody a different, but still orthodox, idea of masculinity or femininity. Likewise, women are still socially rewarded for conventional attractiveness and nurturance; a woman who is very 'masculine' in manner can be seen as a threat to gender hierarchy in a way a trans woman may not be, because the latter is understood as “moving into” an existing, familiar category.

You can think of it like this: modern culture has become more open to people changing themselves to fit the old boxes than to changing the boxes themselves. Medical transition fits the old boxes; gender‑nonconforming men and women push us to redraw the boxes or admit they were never clean lines to begin with."


Q: Is religion the historical influence that men and women are clearly different?

(P) "Religion has been a major historical force in drawing a sharp line between men and women,
but it is not the only one and it did not invent the idea by itself.

What religion contributed

Many major religious traditions (especially in their official or 'orthodox' forms) have taught that men and women have distinct God‑given roles: men as leaders, protectors, and public figures; women as wives, mothers, and keepers of the home. In Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, scripture and commentary have often been interpreted to support male authority in family and religious life, and to restrict women’s roles and mobility.

Why it is not only religion

Long before or alongside organized religion, biological differences (pregnancy, breastfeeding, average strength) and economic systems (agriculture, warfare, inheritance) encouraged societies to divide labor by sex and to build cultural stories around that division. Philosophical and cultural traditions independent of religion, such as Greek philosophy and later secular ideologies, also portrayed women as more emotional, domestic, or intellectually inferior, and these ideas fed into religious interpretations rather than coming only from them.

How religion amplified and preserved it

Religions provided sacred stories, laws, and rituals that encoded gender roles as part of divine order, which made the male–female divide feel timeless and unquestionable. Because religious institutions often controlled education, marriage law, and public morality, their teachings about 'proper' masculinity and femininity helped fix those distinctions across generations and legal systems.

Modern scholarship’s view

Many researchers argue that institutional religion has been 'one of the most important shapers' of traditional sex roles in the West, even while acknowledging that religious texts and movements also contain more egalitarian strands that some modern believers now emphasize. So religion is best seen as a powerful carrier and justifier of gender differentiation that interacted with economic, political, and cultural forces, rather than the single original cause."


Q: Sex attraction seems to be the great societal taboo (it's acceptable to have
opposite gender characteristics but not same sex attraction).


(P) "This is something very real: in many cultures today, it is often more 'acceptable' to play with gender expression than to openly express same‑sex desire. This isn’t because same‑sex attraction is rarer or less natural; it’s because it still hits a deep cultural nerve that gender nonconformity sometimes doesn't:

- Many societies are slowly becoming more tolerant of LGBTQ+ people in law and public life, but same‑sex attraction and relationships remain heavily stigmatized in many places, often framed as immoral, 'unnatural', or threatening to the social order.

- This stigma shows up in families, schools, and communities: people may hide or delay disclosing same‑sex attraction out of fear of rejection, especially in more conservative or religious environments.

- By contrast, certain kinds of gender nonconformity (a woman being 'tomboyish', a man caring about fashion) can sometimes be tolerated or even trivialized as personality quirks, as long as the person is still seen as straight and fulfills traditional roles.

Social psychologists have found that people, especially men, often anticipate more stigma for same‑sex sexual behavior than for other 'rule‑breaking' behaviors, which makes same‑sex attraction feel like a forbidden line they must not cross.​ Historically, religious and legal systems targeted same‑sex acts specifically - criminalizing or pathologizing them - so that 'who you desire' was policed more harshly than 'how you express your gender” and that legacy is still with us.

Same‑sex attraction is a normal variant of human sexuality, and major psychological and medical organizations are clear that it is not an illness or moral defect. The taboo says more about society’s unresolved fear and need for sex control."


:lol: At 80, these concerns are becoming a "Been there! Done that!",
actually, vicariously, internet research, or in gossip. Memory fade
is now making it difficult to remember which was which. :duh
Fortunately, AI never tires of explaining "What's 'sex'?"

Rod :)
Amigoo
Family
Posts: 14372
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Please type in these numbers: 46373: 0
Please type in these numbers:91294: 0
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: World Views

Post by Amigoo »

Re: https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/no-t ... experience
"No tips, worse service? Restaurant owners warn trend is 'degrading' dining experience"

:idea: What's degrading is restaurant's substitution of increased tips
for staff salary, effectively making tips less service related. :roll:


Rod :)
Post Reply