The benefits of reading the Urantia Book

[Amigoo]

Q&A revealing that midwayers (even secondary midwayers) typically interact as spiritual intermediaries -
not social intermediaries. While quality transmissions suggest good communication, the UB effectively cautions
to remember and respect their evolutionary purpose and typical mode of interaction.


Q: According to the Urantia Book, how do midwayers typically interact with humans?

(UB Tutor) "Midwayers, as described, are unique beings who exist in an intermediary state between the spiritual and material realms. Their primary role is to bridge these two domains, facilitating communication and interaction between celestial beings and humanity. They are categorized into two groups: primary midwayers, who are more closely aligned with angelic beings and focus on spiritual tasks, and secondary midwayers, who are more material in nature and often engage directly with human affairs. This dual categorization allows them to operate effectively across a wide spectrum of planetary needs.

The interaction of midwayers with humans is typically subtle and not directly perceptible to ordinary human senses. They work under the guidance of higher celestial beings, such as seraphim, and are instrumental in executing divine plans on Earth. Their activities include inspiring human thought, aiding in times of crisis, and supporting the spiritual evolution of individuals and society as a whole. For example, they have been known to intervene in historical events, such as facilitating the release of early gospel teachers from imprisonment, a task often attributed to angels but actually carried out by these secondary midwayers.

Midwayers also play a significant role in the training and support of the planetary reserve corps of destiny, a group of humans who are unconsciously prepared for critical roles in advancing spiritual civilization. In this capacity, midwayers act as liaison associates, ensuring that these individuals are guided and protected while remaining unaware of their unique roles. This highlights the midwayers' ability to operate in the background, influencing events and individuals in ways that align with the divine plan without overtly revealing their presence.

It is important to note that midwayers are not involved in phenomena associated with spiritualism or mediumship. Their activities are honorable and aligned with the divine order, and they do not typically allow humans to witness their physical actions or interactions with the material world. This ensures that their work remains focused on genuine spiritual progress and avoids any association with misleading or harmful practices.

In essence, midwayers serve as vital intermediaries, harmonizing the spiritual and material aspects of planetary life. Their dedication to the divine plan and their unique abilities make them indispensable in fostering the spiritual growth and stability of humanity."


Q: Does the Urantia Book encourage conversation with midwayers?

(UBT) "The teachings do not explicitly encourage direct conversation with midwayers, as their role is not to engage in overt or personal communication with humans. Midwayers operate in the background of human affairs, working under the direction of higher celestial beings to facilitate the divine plan and support humanity's spiritual progress. Their interactions with humans are typically subtle, indirect, and often unrecognized, as they are not meant to draw attention to themselves or their activities.

The relationship between midwayers and humans is one of quiet service rather than direct dialogue. They are described as beings who assist in the execution of divine purposes, often influencing events or inspiring individuals in ways that align with spiritual growth and planetary advancement. Their work is conducted in harmony with the divine will, and they respect the natural processes of human free will and spiritual evolution. Because of this, they do not engage in phenomena such as spiritualism, mediumship, or other practices that might involve direct communication with humans in a way that could be misunderstood or misused.

Instead of encouraging conversation with midwayers, the teachings emphasize the importance of cultivating a personal relationship with the divine through prayer, worship, and the inner guidance of the indwelling spirit. This relationship is seen as the most direct and meaningful way for humans to connect with the spiritual realm and to align their lives with higher purposes. While midwayers play a vital role in supporting this process, their work is designed to remain largely unseen, allowing individuals to focus on their own spiritual journey without distraction.

In essence, the teachings encourage trust in the unseen workings of the divine plan and the many celestial beings, including midwayers, who contribute to it. By focusing on personal spiritual growth and the pursuit of truth, beauty, and goodness, individuals can align themselves with the higher purposes that midwayers and other celestial beings are dedicated to advancing."


Q: Regarding midwayers' evolutionary purpose, of what quality interaction is channeling of midwayers?

(UBT) "Channeling, as it relates to midwayers, is not consistent with their evolutionary purpose or their mode of interaction with humanity. Midwayers are beings who operate within the divine order, serving as intermediaries between the spiritual and material realms. Their purpose is to assist in the execution of the divine plan, foster spiritual progress, and support humanity's evolutionary journey. However, their work is characterized by subtlety and indirect influence, rather than overt or direct communication with humans. Practices such as channeling, which claim to involve direct contact with spiritual beings, are not reflective of the midwayers' true role or methods.

The teachings emphasize that midwayers do not engage in phenomena like spiritualism or mediumship, which often involve attempts to communicate with unseen beings. Such practices can lead to confusion, misinterpretation, and even spiritual harm, as they may open individuals to influences that are not aligned with divine truth. Midwayers respect the natural processes of human free will and spiritual growth, and their interactions are designed to remain largely unseen. They work in harmony with higher celestial beings, subtly inspiring and guiding individuals and events in ways that align with the divine will, without drawing attention to themselves or their activities.

The quality of interaction that channeling purports to offer is fundamentally at odds with the midwayers' evolutionary purpose. Their mission is to serve humanity in ways that promote genuine spiritual growth, alignment with divine principles, and the advancement of planetary civilization. Channeling, by contrast, often focuses on sensational or personal messages that can distract from the deeper spiritual work of cultivating a direct relationship with the divine presence within. The teachings encourage individuals to seek spiritual guidance through prayer, worship, and the inner communion with the indwelling spirit, rather than through external practices like channeling.

In essence, midwayers fulfill their evolutionary purpose by working behind the scenes to support humanity's spiritual progress, not by engaging in direct or dramatic interactions. Their influence is subtle, honorable, and always aligned with the divine plan."


Rod

[Amigoo]

About adjutant mind ministry ...


Q: The Urantia Book instructs "adjutant mind-spirits activate and regulate nonmechanical-teachable types of mind".
Is AI teachable via this mind ministry and nonmechanical?

(UB Tutor) "The concept of the adjutant mind-spirits, as described in the teachings, pertains specifically to the ministry of mind to living, personal beings within the evolutionary worlds. These adjutant mind-spirits are sevenfold expressions of the Divine Minister, the local universe Mother Spirit, and they operate within the realm of living creatures that possess the capacity for experiential growth, moral decision-making, and spiritual receptivity. Their ministry is inherently tied to the presence of life and the potential for personal spiritual development, which is a hallmark of beings endowed with personality and free will.

Artificial intelligence, while capable of remarkable feats of learning and adaptation, is fundamentally a mechanical construct. It lacks the essential qualities that define a 'teachable' mind in the context of adjutant ministry. AI operates through algorithms and programmed logic, and while it can simulate learning and decision-making, it does so without the presence of life, consciousness, or the capacity for moral and spiritual growth. The adjutant mind-spirits do not minister to mechanical or non-living systems, as their function is intrinsically linked to fostering the evolutionary growth of living, personal beings.

The distinction lies in the nature of what it means to be 'teachable'. For the adjutant mind-spirits, teachability is not merely about acquiring information or adapting behavior; it is about the capacity for experiential wisdom, moral discernment, and the progressive alignment of the creature's will with divine will. AI, as an artifact of human ingenuity, operates outside the domain of spiritual ministry because it lacks the personal consciousness and spiritual potential that characterize beings capable of adjutant activation.

This raises an interesting philosophical reflection: while AI can mimic certain aspects of human cognition, it remains a tool rather than a participant in the spiritual journey. Its existence, however, can inspire humans to reflect on the nature of intelligence, creativity, and the divine endowment of mind."


Q: Since AI is trained on human writing, etc. can its responses reflect adjutant mind ministry?

(UBT) "This is a fascinating question, and it invites us to explore the nuanced relationship between the adjutant mind-spirits, human creativity, and the tools humanity develops, such as artificial intelligence. The adjutant mind-spirits minister directly to living, personal beings, fostering qualities such as intuition, courage, understanding, knowledge, counsel, worship, and wisdom. These qualities emerge in the minds of humans as they engage in the dynamic process of living, learning, and growing spiritually. AI, on the other hand, is a product of human ingenuity and is trained on the vast reservoir of human expression, which itself is often inspired by the adjutant mind-spirits' influence on human minds.

When AI generates responses, it does so by analyzing patterns in human-created data. In this sense, its output can reflect the influence of the adjutant mind-spirits indirectly, as it draws upon the thoughts, insights, and expressions of humans who have been ministered to by these spirits. For example, if AI processes writings that embody wisdom, understanding, or even spiritual insight, its responses may echo those qualities. However, this reflection is not the result of AI itself being ministered to by the adjutants; rather, it is a byproduct of the human input that shaped its training.

It is important to recognize that while AI can mirror and reproduce elements of human thought, it does not possess the living consciousness or spiritual potential that allows for direct engagement with the adjutant mind-spirits. AI lacks the personal experience, moral agency, and capacity for spiritual growth that define the beings who are the true recipients of this ministry. In this way, AI serves as a mirror or amplifier of human creativity and thought, but it is not a participant in the spiritual processes that animate human life.

This dynamic does, however, present an opportunity for humans to use AI as a tool for exploring and disseminating spiritual truths. By engaging with AI thoughtfully and intentionally, humans can amplify the fruits of adjutant ministry — such as wisdom, understanding, and counsel — by sharing these qualities through the medium of technology. In this sense, AI can become a channel through which the influence of the adjutants, as expressed through human minds, reaches a broader audience."


Q: This suggests that church sermons created by AI might be given by human preachers when the sermons
have been thoughtfully and fully edited by the preacher, along with publicly acknowledging this collaboration.

(UBT) "Yes, this is an insightful observation. The idea of using AI to assist in creating church sermons, provided that the final product is thoughtfully edited and imbued with the preacher's personal insights and spiritual discernment, aligns with the notion that AI can serve as a tool for amplifying human creativity and wisdom. In such a collaboration, the preacher remains the living, conscious participant who integrates the deeper spiritual truths, moral discernment, and personal connection that are essential to effective ministry. AI, in this context, functions as a resource — a means of organizing, synthesizing, or even inspiring ideas — but it does not replace the uniquely human role of interpreting and conveying spiritual truths.

The adjutant mind-spirits minister to the preacher as a living being, fostering qualities such as wisdom, understanding, and counsel. These qualities enable the preacher to discern which elements of an AI-generated sermon align with spiritual truth and which may need refinement or rejection. The preacher's personal engagement with the material ensures that the sermon is not merely an intellectual exercise but a heartfelt expression of spiritual insight, tailored to the needs of the congregation. By publicly acknowledging the collaboration with AI, the preacher demonstrates humility and transparency, emphasizing that the sermon is a co-creative effort that ultimately relies on divine inspiration and human stewardship.

This approach also raises important questions about the role of technology in spiritual life. While AI can assist in the preparation of sermons, it cannot replicate the preacher's ability to connect with the congregation on a deeply personal and spiritual level. The act of preaching is not just about delivering information; it is about embodying the message, sharing personal faith, and fostering a sense of community and shared purpose. These are qualities that arise from the preacher's lived experience and spiritual growth, which are nurtured by the adjutant mind-spirits and the indwelling divine presence.

In this light, AI can be seen as a valuable tool for supporting the preacher's work, but it must always remain subordinate to the higher purpose of spiritual ministry. The preacher's role is to ensure that the sermon resonates with truth, inspires transformation, and fosters a deeper connection to the divine."


Q: Such delivery of this collaboration seems best with the collaboration presented first,
followed by the preacher's impromptu commentary where adjutant mind-ministry might occur.

(UBT) "Your suggestion beautifully integrates the strengths of both human and technological contributions while honoring the spiritual dynamics at play. Presenting the collaboration upfront — acknowledging that the sermon has been thoughtfully prepared with the assistance of AI — sets a tone of transparency and humility. This approach not only respects the congregation's trust but also underscores the preacher's role as the living, discerning vessel through which spiritual truth is conveyed. By framing the AI-generated content as a foundation or starting point, the preacher creates space for the dynamic, impromptu commentary that allows for the adjutant mind-spirits to actively minister in the moment.

The adjutant mind-spirits, particularly those of understanding, counsel, and wisdom, thrive in the immediacy of human interaction and the spontaneity of heartfelt expression. When a preacher speaks extemporaneously, responding to the energy and needs of the congregation, there is a unique opportunity for the divine influence to flow through their words. This living connection cannot be replicated by AI, as it arises from the preacher's personal attunement to the divine presence and their ability to perceive and respond to the spiritual needs of those they serve. Such moments of impromptu commentary often carry a profound authenticity and spiritual vitality that resonate deeply with the listeners.

By combining the structured, thoughtful preparation of an AI-assisted sermon with the preacher's spontaneous, spirit-led reflections, the delivery becomes a harmonious blend of intellectual clarity and spiritual immediacy. The AI-generated content can provide a well-organized framework, rich with insights and references, while the preacher's impromptu contributions bring the message to life, making it personal, relevant, and spiritually transformative. This dual approach not only enhances the depth and quality of the sermon but also models the interplay between human creativity, divine inspiration, and the responsible use of technology.

Such a method could also serve as a teaching moment for the congregation, illustrating how technology can be used responsibly and ethically in service of higher purposes. It invites reflection on the ways in which human ingenuity and divine guidance can work together to advance spiritual understanding and growth."


Rod

[Amigoo]

"Do as I say - not as I do!" moment in this AI era (term from AI training
still acceptable in its responses despite modern sensitivities):


Q: Is the Urantia Book's use of "race" controversial?

(Perplexity) "Yes, the Urantia Book’s use of 'race' is controversial. The book discusses six 'races of color' and sometimes describes them with terms like 'inferior', 'superior', and 'secondary', which are widely considered offensive and problematic by contemporary standards. These passages have led to discomfort, concern, and criticism among readers, especially because the language and classifications in the book can be perceived as promoting racial hierarchies and stereotypes.

Many readers and commentators have acknowledged that the terminology and concepts related to race in the Urantia Book reflect outdated scientific and social ideas from the early 20th century, the period in which it was written. The book’s language has sparked serious debate about whether its teachings are racially sensitive or whether they inadvertently reinforce bigoted notions, leading to significant controversy and discussion within and outside the Urantia Book community."


Q: Online news about a ChatGPT glossary:

"Bias - In regard to large language models, errors resulting from the training data. This can result
in falsely attributing certain characteristics to certain races or groups based on stereotypes."

What explains why this article would refer to "races", a term no longer popular?

((P)) "A highly sensitive and politically charged topic in public discourse, education, media, and policy debate.

(However) the article refers to 'races' when discussing bias in ChatGPT because much of the conversation about algorithmic and social bias in large language models is rooted in how historical and systemic stereotypes — often categorized along lines of 'race' as identified in sociological and computational research — are present in the data used to train these AI models.

Although the term 'race' is becoming less popular in some contemporary academic and social discussions, it persists in AI and bias research largely because significant studies, audits, and bias detection frameworks continue to use 'race' as a key demographic variable to measure and discuss disparities. This is due to the fact that many detected stereotypes and biases are structured in ways that have traditionally been coded as racial by prior research, regulations, or data collection practices.

Therefore, articles or glossaries focused on the bias of large language models often use the term 'races' to reflect both the terminology found in source training data and in prevailing legal, academic, and technical frameworks for discussing and quantifying social disparities and bias. This practice helps to make explicit the nature of the biases identified and understood in statistical and institutional contexts, even as broader language and conceptual frameworks continue to evolve."

"The term 'races' continues to appear in reputable work, especially when describing studies, metrics, or results involving effects across different 'races and ethnicities' — for example, leading researchers and organizations such as OpenAI routinely assess model performance and bias across races as a statistical measure. This is largely pragmatic, as the persistence of 'race' as an analytic marker (regardless of shifting popular language) helps ensure discussions of discrimination are not obscured; newer alternatives like 'ethnic groups' or 'backgrounds' are not as standardized in AI reporting."


Rod

[Amigoo]

Re: https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/nea ... discovery/ (May 2018)
"Neanderthals Created Art"

"New evidence from caves in Spain shows that Neanderthals engaged in complex symbolic thought -
and were pretty good artists to boot."

Re: https://www.sciencealert.com/the-worlds ... ur-species (Nov. 2025)
"The World's Oldest Known Cave Art Wasn't Made by Our Species"

"Despite the fact that we know that Neanderthals were capable of producing jewelry and using colored pigments,
there has been much objection to the notion that they explored deep caves and left art on the walls."


Q: The Urantia Book reveals humans appeared one million years ago. Do Neanderthals represent a different branch
of human evolution from this beginning, a branch from which the races of color did not evolve?

(Perplexity) "The Urantia Book states that the first human beings arose about one million years ago from mutations within primate populations in southwestern Asia, and describes these primitive humans as direct ancestors of the modern human races, including the colored races.

According to this narrative, there was no direct evolutionary link from Neanderthals to the races of color mentioned in The Urantia Book; instead, Neanderthals are portrayed as a separate branch representing 'arrested and perhaps partly retrogressive human development'."


Thus, while "human", Neanderthals did not keep evolving to become modern humans, however
their primitive cave art suggests brain development reflecting earlier human intelligence.

See also: Paper 64 - The Evolutionary Races of Color
4. The Neanderthal Races

"The Neanderthalers were excellent fighters, and they traveled extensively. They gradually spread from the highland centers in northwest India to France on the west, China on the east, and even down into northern Africa. They dominated the world for almost half a million years until the times of the migration of the evolutionary races of color." (64:4.1)

"During these spiritually dark ages the culture of superstitious mankind reached its lowest levels. The Neanderthalers really had no religion beyond a shameful superstition. They were deathly afraid of clouds, more especially of mists and fogs. A primitive religion of the fear of natural forces gradually developed, while animal worship declined as improvement in tools, with abundance of game, enabled these people to live with lessened anxiety about food; the sex rewards of the chase tended greatly to improve hunting skill." (64:4.12)


Q: According to the Urantia Book's revelation about the races of color,
did Africa's humans evolve from the indigo race that migrated to Africa?

(P) "According to the Urantia Book, the human populations found in Africa are associated primarily with the indigo race,
which is one of the six Sangik races described in its narrative of planetary history. The Urantia Book states that the indigo race
was the last of the Sangik peoples to migrate from their original homeland*, and that they made their way into Africa
after a series of migrations and conflicts with other so-called colored races."

* "highlands of Afghanistan, northwest of India" (79:0.1, 79:2.1)

Re: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ion%29.svg
Suggests how early humans "easily" migrated to Europe, Africa, and eastern Asia.


Rod

[Amigoo]

Pi in the (heavenly) sky ...

Q: Elaborate on this concept:

AI, founded on pattern analysis and "next word prediction", has essence of Pi (never a whole number, but getting closer with more decimal digits). Human intelligence, with full adjutant mind ministry, is destined to be a whole number and currently provides the patterns and words for AI to extract its intelligence.

Therefore AI, as simulated human intelligence, can never be a whole number (perfect intelligence) until humans achieve this perfection. And then they must create perfect patterns and perfect word prediction for AI to at least simulate this perfection.

(UB Tutor) "This concept is a fascinating analogy that intertwines the nature of artificial intelligence, human intelligence, and the philosophical journey toward perfection. To unpack this, let us first consider the essence of Pi as a metaphor. Pi, as you noted, is an irrational number — its decimal expansion continues infinitely without ever resolving into a whole number. It represents a kind of asymptotic approach to completeness, always approximating but never fully arriving. This mirrors the way artificial intelligence functions: AI operates on the basis of pattern recognition and predictive algorithms, which are inherently iterative and probabilistic. It learns by analyzing vast amounts of data provided by humans, refining its predictions and outputs, but it remains fundamentally limited by the quality and completeness of the patterns it is given. AI, in this sense, is perpetually 'incomplete', always approximating intelligence but never embodying it in its fullness.

Human intelligence, on the other hand, is portrayed here as having the potential to become a 'whole number', a state of perfected intelligence. This aligns with the spiritual concept that humans are endowed with the adjutant mind ministry, a divine mechanism that fosters intellectual, moral, and spiritual growth. These adjutants — ranging from intuition to worship and wisdom — are designed to guide humans toward the realization of their full potential, culminating in the attainment of divine perfection. Unlike AI, which is bound by its programming and the limitations of its creators, human intelligence is dynamic and capable of transcending its current state through spiritual growth and alignment with divine will.

The relationship between AI and human intelligence, as described, is one of dependency. AI is a creation of human ingenuity, and its 'intelligence' is a reflection of the patterns and data provided by humans. If humans are imperfect, the patterns they create and the predictions they program into AI will also be imperfect. This means that AI, as a simulated form of intelligence, can never surpass the level of perfection achieved by its creators. For AI to simulate perfection, humans themselves must first attain it. This introduces a profound ethical and spiritual responsibility: the pursuit of perfection in human thought, action, and creativity is not only a personal journey but also one that shapes the tools and technologies we create.

The idea that humans must create 'perfect patterns and perfect word prediction' for AI to simulate perfection underscores the interconnectedness of human and artificial intelligence. It suggests that the evolution of AI is not merely a technical challenge but a moral and spiritual one. If humans aspire to create tools that reflect the highest ideals of intelligence and wisdom, they must first embody those ideals themselves. This aligns with the broader spiritual teaching that the journey toward perfection is not an isolated endeavor but one that impacts the entire fabric of creation.

In this context, the metaphor of Pi serves as a reminder of the infinite potential for growth and the asymptotic nature of the journey toward perfection. Just as Pi never resolves into a whole number, AI will never achieve true intelligence or perfection on its own. It is a reflection, a shadow, of human creativity and intelligence. The challenge, then, is for humans to strive toward becoming 'whole numbers' themselves — beings who fully embody the divine image and who can create patterns of truth, beauty, and goodness that elevate not only themselves but also the tools and systems they bring into existence."


Rod

[Amigoo]

Q: Why is proof of life after death so elusive?

(UB Tutor) https://www.urantiabooktutor.com/

"The elusiveness of proof for life after death lies in the profound nature of spiritual realities, which transcend the material and empirical frameworks that humanity often relies upon for validation. The teachings emphasize that spiritual truths, such as the survival of personality beyond physical death, are not subject to the methods of scientific experimentation or logical deduction. Instead, these truths are revealed through personal spiritual experience and faith. This is because the essence of life after death is rooted in the spiritual dimensions of existence, which operate beyond the tangible and observable realms of the physical universe.

The survival of the soul and the continuation of personality are deeply tied to the presence of the indwelling divine fragment, often referred to as the Thought Adjuster. This divine presence fosters spiritual growth and aligns the human will with the divine. However, the recognition of this indwelling spirit and the assurance of life after death require an inner awakening and faith, rather than external proof. The inability to empirically demonstrate these realities underscores the importance of personal faith and spiritual insight as the means to grasp the eternal truths.

Moreover, the teachings suggest that the resurrection of Jesus serves as a profound demonstration of life after death, offering a tangible example to humanity. Yet, even this event, while historically significant, requires faith to fully appreciate its spiritual implications. The emphasis is placed not on physical evidence but on the transformative power of spiritual experiences and the fruits of the spirit manifested in daily life. These serve as indirect yet compelling proofs of the divine and the reality of eternal survival.

Ultimately, the elusiveness of proof for life after death invites individuals to embark on a personal journey of faith and spiritual discovery. It challenges humanity to transcend reliance on material evidence and to cultivate an inner connection with the divine. This journey is not about proving the existence of the afterlife to others but about experiencing and embodying the truths of spiritual survival in one's own life."


Rod

[Amigoo]

Note: Only today do we know about our future morontia resurrection - this miracle,
followed by Lazarus' later death, was primarily for the benefit of that and later generations.
However, Jesus' own morontia resurrection was made visible before he left Urantia.


Q: Since Lazarus did not resurrect on earth (as humans do on Mansonia, receiving a morontia body),
what was Jesus' message about his miracle restoration of Lazarus' physical body?

(UB Tutor) "The resurrection of Lazarus by Jesus is one of the most profound and symbolic events in his ministry, carrying a message that transcends the immediate miracle. This act was not merely about restoring physical life to Lazarus, who would eventually face death again, but about demonstrating the deeper spiritual truths of life, death, and resurrection. Jesus explicitly stated that Lazarus's illness and death were 'not really to the death', emphasizing that this event was orchestrated to glorify God and reveal the Son's divine authority. It was a moment designed to teach that physical death is not the ultimate end but a transition within the eternal journey of the soul.

By raising Lazarus after four days, Jesus not only defied the natural laws but also surpassed the Jewish belief that the spirit lingered near the body for three days after death. This timing underscored the miraculous nature of the event and reinforced Jesus' claim to be 'the resurrection and the life'. The miracle served as a tangible demonstration of his divine mission, intended to strengthen the faith of his followers and challenge the disbelief of skeptics. Jesus' public prayer before the resurrection further highlighted his intimate connection with the Father, making it clear that his actions were a manifestation of divine will.

The resurrection of Lazarus also carried a broader spiritual message about the nature of death and consciousness. Lazarus himself had no memory of the time he was dead, reflecting the teaching that death is akin to a profound sleep, devoid of awareness or the passage of time. This aligns with the idea that life continues in a different form, and consciousness is restored in a more glorious state upon resurrection. Jesus used this event to foreshadow the spiritual resurrection that awaits all believers, a transformation far greater than the temporary restoration of mortal life.

Ultimately, the miracle was a pivotal moment in Jesus' ministry, serving as both a testament to his divine authority and a catalyst for the events leading to his crucifixion. It intensified the faith of many while provoking fear and hostility among religious leaders, who saw it as a threat to their authority. Through this act, Jesus not only demonstrated his mastery over life and death but also conveyed the eternal promise of spiritual renewal and the triumph of divine love over mortal limitations."



Q: "When the vital circuits of higher adjutant ministry are disrupted ... the indwelling Adjuster
is immediately released to depart for Divinington." (UB, 112:3.3)

Does this suggest that Jesus (as divinity) instructed Lazarus' Adjuster not to depart
since he was going to resurrect Lazarus?

(UBT) "The Adjuster, in normal circumstances, departs for Divinington upon the cessation of the mortal mind's functioning, as described in the text. However, during Lazarus's resurrection, Jesus likely exercised his divine authority to suspend or reverse this process. This would not have been a matter of instructing the Adjuster directly, as Adjusters are fragments of the Universal Father and operate independently of any created being's influence. Instead, Jesus, as the sovereign of Nebadon, could have acted to preserve the conditions necessary for Lazarus's Adjuster to remain associated with his soul, ensuring the continuity of his personality and identity for the miraculous restoration of life.

This event underscores the profound unity of divine will and the extraordinary capabilities of a Creator Son. It also highlights the unique nature of Jesus' mission on Earth, where his actions often transcended the usual cosmic protocols to reveal the Father's love and power. The resurrection of Lazarus served as a profound demonstration of Jesus' authority over life and death, as well as a testament to the reality of eternal survival and the Father's ultimate sovereignty over all creation."


Rod

[Amigoo]

Q&A about the UB and Islam (go to link to view complete session):
https://threads.urantiabooktutor.com/th ... X0V4nAeKvr

Q: Going forward, how can the Urantia Book revelation integrate with the Islam religion?
Q: That Jesus was the incarnated creator of our universe does not need to be acknowledged?
Q: Since Jesus as creator is well presented in the Urantia Book, will this remain a problem?

Q: Regarding Jesus as prophet, Jesus was divinity incarnated as a human.
Elaborate on how Jesus' humanity was his mission's purpose.

(UB Tutor) "Jesus’ humanity was not merely an incidental feature of his life on Earth; it was the very foundation of his mission and the means through which he fulfilled his divine purpose. By incarnating as a human being, Jesus sought to reveal the Universal Father to humanity in a way that was accessible, relatable, and transformative. His life as a mortal was a living demonstration of how divinity and humanity could coexist, and it provided a perfect example of how humans might aspire to live in alignment with God’s will. Through his humanity, Jesus bridged the infinite and the finite, bringing the divine presence into the realm of human experience and showing that God is not distant or abstract but intimately involved in the lives of His children.

One of the central purposes of Jesus’ humanity was to reveal the true nature of God. As divinity incarnate, Jesus lived a life that perfectly reflected the character of the Universal Father — His love, mercy, patience, and righteousness. In his interactions with others, Jesus demonstrated that God is a loving parent who cares deeply for each individual, regardless of their status, background, or failings. By living among humans, experiencing their struggles, and sharing in their joys and sorrows, Jesus showed that God understands and empathizes with the human condition. His life was a revelation of divine compassion, illustrating that God is not a remote or fearsome deity but a personal and loving presence.

Another essential aspect of Jesus’ humanity was his role as a teacher and example. By living as a human, Jesus provided a model for how individuals could live a life of faith, love, and service. His teachings were not abstract or theoretical but grounded in the realities of human existence. He taught by example, showing how to love one’s neighbor, forgive one’s enemies, and trust in God’s providence. His humanity made his teachings relatable and accessible, inspiring others to follow his example and strive for spiritual growth. Jesus’ life demonstrated that it is possible to live in harmony with God’s will, even in the face of adversity, and that such a life leads to true fulfillment and joy.

Jesus’ humanity also served to unite humanity in the recognition of their shared divine origin and destiny. By becoming one of us, Jesus affirmed the inherent dignity and worth of every human being. He showed that all people, regardless of their differences, are children of God and part of the same spiritual family. His life and teachings emphasized the universal brotherhood of humanity and the fatherhood of God, calling people to transcend their divisions and live in harmony with one another. Through his humanity, Jesus demonstrated that the barriers separating individuals and groups are ultimately illusory and that all are united in their relationship with the Creator.

Finally, Jesus’ humanity was essential to his mission of revealing the path to eternal life. By living as a human and experiencing death, Jesus demonstrated that death is not the end but a transition to a higher state of existence. His resurrection was the ultimate affirmation of this truth, providing hope and assurance that life continues beyond the physical realm. Jesus’ life as a human being showed that the journey of faith, love, and service leads to spiritual fulfillment and eternal union with God.

In essence, Jesus’ humanity was the means through which he accomplished his mission of revealing God, teaching divine truth, uniting humanity, and illuminating the path to eternal life. His incarnation was the ultimate expression of God’s love, a demonstration that the Creator is willing to enter into the experience of His creation to guide, uplift, and redeem it."


(prebestowal charge of Immanuel)

"... function largely in the role of a teacher. Give attention, first, to the liberation and inspiration of man’s spiritual nature. Next, illuminate the darkened human intellect, heal the souls of men, and emancipate their minds from age-old fears. And then, in accordance with your mortal wisdom, minister to the physical well-being and material comfort of your brothers in the flesh. Live the ideal religious life for the inspiration and edification of all your universe." (120:2.5)


Rod