Remote Viewing Session - They Targeted the Young Jesus

[RunningScroll]

Hi Folks

This trailer encapsulates a recent remote viewing session by the Farsight Institute that set the Young Jesus as the session target. It lines up very well with The Urantia Book, good efforts on their behalf! Here is the link to the trailer. Regards, Dylan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmMovUMd3fU

[Amigoo]

Fascinating remote viewing, while minimally associated with all that's revealed in the Urantia Papers
about these focus points, promises informative viewing of later analyses!

However, ChatGPT's "Jesus was not God" seems to conflict with this UB statement:

"And thus it was and is and forever will be true of the Eternal Son and of all the co-ordinate Creator Sons:
'He who has seen the Son has seen the Father'." (6:2.2)

Since ChatGPT uses a Large Language Model trained on much data, the UB Papers might influence how it responds.
AI inquiry might be prompted with "Without considering the Urantia Papers and directly related sources ..."


Q: Remote Viewing seems to be reality but not sufficiently reliable to be considered science.
Is there any science that supports Remote Viewing, such as mental telepathy?

[some psychics seem to have better remote viewing skills than most psychics,
hinting of rare attunement to celestial beings and forces]

(Perplexity) "Remote viewing has been the subject of scientific investigation, but the evidence for its existence
remains controversial and inconclusive. While some studies have reported statistically significant results,
the scientific consensus does not support the reality of remote viewing or mental telepathy.

Some research efforts have produced results that proponents claim support the existence of remote viewing:

- The Stanford Research Institute (SRI) conducted experiments in the 1970s that reported
positive results for remote viewing abilities.

- The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR) carried out extensive research,
reporting statistically significant results by 1989.

- The CIA sponsored a remote viewing program, which included experiments at SRI and later
at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).

However, these studies have faced significant criticism from the scientific community:

- Methodological flaws: Many early experiments had invalidating flaws, and more recent,
properly controlled experiments have not shown positive results.

- Lack of replication: Independent laboratories have failed to consistently replicate positive findings.

- Absence of a theoretical framework: There is no accepted scientific theory to explain how remote viewing could work.

- Potential for sensory cueing: Critics have pointed out that some experiments may have inadvertently
provided sensory cues to participants.

- Statistical concerns: Some researchers have questioned the statistical analyses used in remote viewing studies.

The mainstream scientific community generally regards remote viewing as pseudoscience. The lack of consistent,
replicable results under controlled conditions has led to widespread skepticism among scientists.

While some researchers continue to investigate anomalous cognition, including remote viewing, the field remains controversial
and has not gained acceptance within mainstream science.

While there have been scientific investigations into remote viewing, the current body of evidence
does not support its validity as a real phenomenon. More rigorous research would be needed
to change the scientific consensus on this topic."


Rod

[happyrain]

Thanks Dylan, very interesting.