![study :study:](./images/smilies/icon_study.gif)
Re:
https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/zoo ... e-6382466/
"Zoom under fire for AI policy change"
(web page comment, per the article) "Additionally, under section 10.4 of the updated terms, Zoom has secured a 'perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicensable, and transferable license' to redistribute, publish, access, use, store, transmit, review, disclose, preserve, extract, modify, reproduce, share, use, display, copy, distribute, translate, transcribe, create derivative works, and process Customer Content."
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Not so much a problem now with Zoom-created content (audio, video, etc.) being detectable as Zoomistry by many people, but sooner than later this content will not be so detectable. Suppose a video will exist later where you explain how the Urantia Book was authored by one human. And suppose that a growing number of dedicated UB readers also claim to share this opinion as proven by their own videos that they neither created nor authorized.
![scratch :scratch:](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif)
What could go wrong, Zoomeister? It's only user-authorized AI creativity!
Best guess: Zoom to another platform with more friendly Terms of Service.
Rod
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)