When we were initially created, which was by modifying the dna of primates
and the location was Lemuria, we had elongated heads.
Thanks for this new perspective, Geoff. AI's representation
of our former elongation should be very popular (and profitable).

Current AI has access to mountains of information,
so this response suggests Lemuria is a 4D concept ...
and never was 3D reality:
Re:
https://www.perplexity.ai/
Q: What is the civilization of Lemuria?
"The civilization of Lemuria is a hypothetical lost continent and ancient civilization that was proposed in the 19th century but has been thoroughly debunked by modern science. Here are the key points about the mythical Lemurian civilization:
Origins and Proponents
The concept of Lemuria originated in 1864 when zoologist Philip Sclater proposed it as a sunken continent in the Indian Ocean to explain the distribution of lemur fossils in Madagascar and India. In the 1880s, occultist Helena Blavatsky incorporated Lemuria into her theosophical beliefs, claiming the Lemurians were a hermaphroditic 'root race' of humanity with psychic powers and a third eye. Other proponents like James Churchward (1832-1936) described Lemuria, which he called 'Mu', as an advanced 64 million-strong civilization with transparent homes, longevity, telepathy, and other supernatural abilities before its destruction around 10,000 BCE.
Mythical Attributes
Lemurians were said to possess an ancient technology more advanced than modern science, allowing them to harness weather, defy gravity, and conduct advanced genetic experiments. They were believed to be the originators of ancient philosophies and the progenitors of other civilizations like Atlantis after Lemuria's destruction by a 'warrior wave' or tsunami. Some accounts claim Lemurian survivors fled to Asia, the Americas, and Pacific islands like Hawaii, where their ruins and descendants allegedly remain.
However, the concept of Lemuria was discredited in the 20th century with the acceptance of plate tectonics and continental drift, which made the existence of such a lost continent untenable. While it persists in pseudoarchaeology and occult beliefs, mainstream science has thoroughly rejected the mythical civilization of Lemuria."

Re:
https://www.perplexity.ai/
Q: Is it possible that Lemurian survivors exist under Mt Shasta?
"The legends of Lemurians living under Mount Shasta are fanciful stories without any factual evidence to support them. These myths originated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, combining ideas about a hypothetical lost continent of Lemuria with occult beliefs and fiction writings.
Origins of the Lemurian Legend
The concept of Lemuria as a lost continent was first proposed in 1864 by zoologist Philip Sclater to explain the distribution of lemur fossils, but it was just a scientific hypothesis without any proof. In the 1880s, the fiction book "A Dweller on Two Planets" by Frederick Spencer Oliver mentioned a secret city inside Mount Shasta, vaguely connecting it to the idea of Lemuria. The Lemurian legend truly took shape in the 1920s-1930s through writings by occultists and theosophists like Wisar Spenle Cerve, who claimed in 1931 that survivors of the lost continent of Lemuria lived in an underground city called Telos beneath Mount Shasta. These writings described Lemurians as an advanced race with psychic abilities who escaped underground before Lemuria was destroyed.
Lack of Evidence
Despite the elaborate mythology built around them,
there is no scientific evidence that Lemurians or their underground city ever existed. The legends appear to be entirely fictional, combining pseudoscientific ideas about lost continents with occult beliefs and pure imagination. Local residents and botanists in the Mount Shasta area have consistently dismissed and questioned the Lemurian legends over the decades. No credible sightings, archaeological remains, or any other proof of their existence has ever been found. The tales likely emerged from a desire to attribute a mystical significance to the striking Mount Shasta landscape.
In summary, while the Lemurian legends make for intriguing stories, they remain fanciful myths without any factual basis to support the idea that survivors of a lost civilization inhabit an underground city beneath Mount Shasta."

Incidentally, with this planet considered as having exceptional natural beauty,
why would life underground (or under sea) be so attractive to space aliens,
especially those who could live above ground in the earth's atmosphere
And if they cannot live above ground, why are they here?

The Klein Bottle suggests 3D and 4D dimensions have only metaphysical - not physical - relationship:
Re:
https://www.perplexity.ai/
Q: Can a Klein bottle be constructed as a 3D object?
"No, a true Klein bottle cannot be constructed as a 3-dimensional object without self-intersections. The Klein bottle is a non-orientable 2-dimensional surface that requires 4 dimensions to be embedded without any self-crossings or intersections. The key reasons why a Klein bottle cannot exist as a proper 3D object are:
Non-orientability: The Klein bottle has only one continuous side, with no distinct inside or outside. This non-orientable property is impossible to achieve in 3 dimensions without creating self-intersections.
Higher dimensions required: To construct a Klein bottle without any self-intersections, it must be embedded in 4-dimensional space. In 3 dimensions, any attempt to create a Klein bottle will inevitably result in the surface intersecting itself.
Paradoxical nature: The Klein bottle exhibits paradoxical properties, such as being a closed surface with no boundary. This is counterintuitive in 3 dimensions, where closed surfaces must have an inside and outside separated by a boundary.
While it is possible to create 3D models or physical representations that approximate the appearance of a Klein bottle, these will always contain self-intersections or discontinuities, as they are projections or immersions of the true 4-dimensional object into 3D space. The search results confirm that a true Klein bottle cannot be turned into a 3D object without self-intersections, and any physical representation will have limitations or distortions.
In summary, the non-orientable and higher-dimensional nature of the Klein bottle makes it impossible to construct as a proper 3D object without violating its fundamental topological properties. It requires the fourth spatial dimension to exist without self-intersections or paradoxes."
Rod
