Re:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... 076657002/
"the law would make it a federal crime for 'any person to intentionally engage' in animal cruelty, including burning,
drowning, suffocating, impaling or otherwise injuring 'non-mammals, birds, reptiles or amphibians'"

On the surface, reduction of cruelty to non-mammals seems commendable, but ...
this broad law would affect shooting of birds for sport and "humanitarian" euthanasia of said animals by vets.
For example, said animals not rescued in a house fire would constitute cruelty by the homeowner,
obligating them (or even children in the family) to attempt rescue.
Also, chickens and turkeys are "birds" ...
Rod
