. . . .and you've posted at :33 again!
What an incredibly synchronicity to be drawn to this film, right as you entangle aspects of the "the kingdom is within." I was overtaken by that sense of the chills reading over your musings on the subject . . .and the updated design again reminds me of what the experience
feels like, in those moments. I never would have guessed that someone could depict, visually, such a wordless feeling. If you try to explain the sensation you simply come up short . . yet somehow or other you captured something of the essence both visually
and with words -- quite an achievement! And now you have me curious about this film.

It reminds me a lot, from your description, of the Tibetan film Milarepa, for he discovered a similar inner truth . . .it's 11:22.
Here's another synchronicity to once again match the experience you are having.

I've just begun "The Girl Who Played with Fire," and the main character is finally attempting to celebrate the strange attributes with which she was born; complex pattern-recognition and a photographic memory. In the book's prequel, "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo," she feels herself a freak, and keeps her abilities a strict secret. Through a series of events she's somehow settled upon a way to explore her curiosity and find where it might lead her. Where someone else might struggle to learn a mathematical formula or the inner workings of computers or things of this nature, it comes naturally to her and she's got it all memorized from her first glance.
So she delves into mathematics. I'm reading about her delight to discover Pythagoras' equation, which "was an epiphany." She's digested and memorized "Dimensions in Mathematics." Diophantus, Archimedes, Newton, Gardner, Fermat. She's on the brink of unlocking the secret of Pierre de Fermat's Last Theorem, which was only unlocked after 25 years of diligent work by Wiles. In seven weeks she unlocks the mystery, refusing to read the section of the book that describes that Wiles discovered. Fermat had seen that Pythagoras' equation, x2 + y2 = z2, could be used to convert the square to a cube, x3 + y3 = z3. In the margin he wrote (translated into English):
I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain. Maddening.
It's a wild synchronicity and reminds me of you so much. Mathematicians said "It was impossible." He was simply showing off. It was a bluff. How convenient that the margin was too narrow! The equation he proposed could not possibly contain whole numbers; many had tried and failed to apply them. "Descartes referred to Fermat by many derogatory epithets, and his English colleague John Wallis called him 'that damned Frenchman.'" They were angry with him for being smarter than them! They envied his prowess, and his relentless vision. He was a mathematical seer.
Similarly, Wiles, who came up with the proof everyone was waiting for, raised a good deal of ire: "Why should
you land upon this proof when we failed to do so?"
I couldn't believe I was reading all of this, and it just reminded me so, so much about your quest. This whole story is probably old news to you. . .but it was new news to me!

It reminds me of what you often say, that mathematicians can say that your quest is nonsense . . but you know the truth, just like Fermat and Wiles.

Wiles had faith.
You have something else in common with Fermat . . .he 'wasn't a mathematician.' But he's now considered the most brilliant self-taught mathematician of all time!

Perhaps you and he share something in common.

I've often compared you to Newton . . .

Thanks for this beautiful work! With love, Michele
