Page 1 of 1

Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:46 pm
by DJKENZ
I've pondered over this all my life & only recently did something in my mind 'connect' that may explain why the SETI project has never gotten a ping back from space...

Here's what the UB says....
-------------------
4.3.3 Much, very much, of the difficulty which Urantia mortals have in understanding God is due to the far-reaching consequences of the lucifer rebellion and the Caligastia betrayal. On worlds not segregated by sin, the evolutionary races are able to formulate far better ideas of the Universal Father; they suffer less from confusion, distortion, and perversion of concept.

7.1.7 ... Sin and rebellion may interfere with the operation of local universe circuits, The lucifer rebellion produced many changes in your system of inhabited worlds and on Urantia, ...


37.8.3 Andovontia is the name of the secondary Universe Circuit Supervisor stationed in our local universe. He is concerned only with spirit and morontia circuits, not with those under the jurisdiction of the power directors. It was he who isolated Urantia at the time of the Caligastia betrayal of the planet during the testing seasons of the lucifer rebellion. In sending greetings to the mortals of Urantia, he expresses pleasure in the anticipation of your sometime restoration to the universe circuits of his supervision.

3.1.10 Concerning God’s presence in a planet, system, constellation, or a universe, .... it is sometimes with the hope of conserving and safeguarding these phases of God’s precious presence that, when some planets [like Earth] (or even systems) have plunged far into spiritual darkness, they are in a certain sense quarantined, or partially isolated from intercourse with the larger units of creation. And all this, as it operates on Urantia, is a spiritually defensive reaction of the majority of the worlds to save themselves, as far as possible, from suffering the isolating consequences of the alienating acts of a headstrong, wicked, and rebellious minority.
-----------------
It's no wonder nobody wants to talk to us. That's my logic....twisted I know...but
that's the best explanation I can find from a book that made sense to me.

Here's more with regard to energy, & I keep RF communication in mind as energy:

15.4.2 The Paradise force organizers transmute space potency into primordial force and evolve this prematerial potential into the primary and secondary energy manifestations of physical reality. When this energy attains gravity-responding levels, the power directors and their associates of the superuniverse regime appear upon the scene and begin their never-ending manipulations designed to establish the manifold power circuits and energy channels of the universes of time and space. Thus does physical matter appear in space, and so is the stage set for the inauguration of universe organization.

29.2.9 4. Local Universe Centers. On the headquarters of each local universe are stationed one hundred power centers of the fourth order. They function to downstep and otherwise to modify the seven power circuits emanating from superuniverse headquarters, thus making them applicable to the services of the constellations and systems. The local astronomical catastrophes of space are of passing concern to these power centers; they are engaged in the orderly dispatch of effective energy to the subsidiary constellations and systems. They are of great assistance to the Creator Sons during the later times of universe organization and energy mobilization. These centers are able to provide intensified lanes of energy useful for interplanetary communication between important inhabited points. Such a lane or line of energy, sometimes also called an energy path, is a direct circuit of energy from one power center to another power center or from one physical controller to another controller. It is an individualized stream of power and stands in contrast to the free space movements of undifferentiated energy.

http://www.truthbook.com

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:28 am
by Geoff
Dear Kenz

This post is in the wrong place, as this is not where the ubook discussion takes place. I will move it if you tell what you intended. It either goes in the discussion forum, or into miscellaneous.

I took a decision and moved it here

It seems to me that the planets not in rebellion are quite possibly too far away, and most certainly would follow orders. And I would not claim to know what those would be.

Its possible that there is one planet worse than us, and lets hope they don't have the ability or inclination to respond. But equally, I understand that once the correcting time started, the rules of engagement were changed. Its possible that some ET visitors who used to be here, may no longer be allowed. Responding to the SETI via another signal is to be honest, a very minimal approach. Turning up to look see would be more likely, if there was a planet that noticed us for the first time, because of SETI.

love,
Geoff

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:32 pm
by DJKENZ
Geoff wrote:Dear Kenz

This post is in the wrong place, as this is not where the ubook discussion takes place. I will move it if you tell what you intended. It either goes in the discussion forum, or into miscellaneous.

I took a decision and moved it here

It seems to me that the planets not in rebellion are quite possibly too far away, and most certainly would follow orders. And I would not claim to know what those would be.

Its possible that there is one planet worse than us, and lets hope they don't have the ability or inclination to respond. But equally, I understand that once the correcting time started, the rules of engagement were changed. Its possible that some ET visitors who used to be here, may no longer be allowed. Responding to the SETI via another signal is to be honest, a very minimal approach. Turning up to look see would be more likely, if there was a planet that noticed us for the first time, because of SETI.

love,
Geoff

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:03 am
by LolaandLight
Or, it could be that there are so many of them down here already living among us, that there is no need to respond in the manner in which the SETI project expects a response. Why respond and then a big deal is made out of the response when they would just rather live quietly along side of us? In plain sight? Or, cloaked as one woman I know believes.

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:06 am
by Elektrum
What does seti mean?

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:12 pm
by DJKENZ
Dear Elektrum,
S.E.T.I stands for the "Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence." :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
This is the site of the organization, it's been operating for a long time:
http://www.seti.org/

You can even participate in their research using your computer (I used to at one time.)
They have a tremendous amount of data that that their radio telescopes collect
and it needs to be parsed using computers.
What you need is a PC and an internet connection.
The way it works is, you can download their program and install it on your PC.
When your PC is not busy doing something (i.e. it's idle) then the SETI program will
automatically run in crunching all those numbers supplied from SETI servers.
Essentially, the program looks for certin patterns in the data & if it finds something of significance, it will
report that back to SETI.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/

Sincerely,
-Kenz-

Re: Why I think the SETI project isn't successful

Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:17 am
by Elektrum
wow. I will try it too. Very weird indeed.