This is the message board for a number of 11:11 web sites created by The 11:11 Progress Group. Links to these various sites can be found at the bottom of this page.
http://board.1111angels.com/
Lots of interesting dates this fall, what does it all mean though?Petra Wilson wrote:And now it's 20.10.2010,
All I want is Truth. I don't understand the number theory but I resonate with it.... 
Dear guru,wirelessguru1 wrote:We all resonate with numbers since mind is a program (software, code, data) - hence 11:11, which really is a digital "clock" synchronization beacon!
..and, of course, love is a force.
Hi Geoff, time is just the inverse of frequency, so no big deal...Geoff wrote:I am not sure what you are saying here. But it is a fact, that you can change the clocks in the house, so they do not reflect time "accurately" and you will still be prompted.
I assume you mean a "digital" clock on your bedside table!?Geoff wrote:Which has only one explanation. That beings exist who are close enough to our dimension that they can actually read the clock on your bedside table.
Well, since mind is a program, it is also digital...and so 11:11.Geoff wrote:That they can interfere with your mind, is actually a "no-brainer" Science has already got to that conclusion. Although, as is typical, not all scientists are willing to accept that conclusion.
love,
Geoff
Not according to our sources, nor does that make any sense from a practical point of view. Time is the measurement of change in a realm. But time can be altered locally, which makes it somewhat more than measurement of change. Time is something George has always been interested in, and has received some communications on that.wirelessguru1 wrote:Hi Geoff, time is just the inverse of frequency, so no big deal...
Hmm. What evidence have you that the mind, which is not in the brain, is actually digital. I am not saying it isn't, just asking what source you have for that. I guess its very likely, since I gather its magnetic in nature. But what sources do you have that discuss the substance of the mind?wirelessguru1 wrote:Either case, I am not debating "existence" but rather the digital nature of all things...since the cosmos et al is a computer network just like The Internet.
Well Geoff, first you need to fully grasp that time is the inverse of frequency and that space is a wavelength in order to then begin to understand the digital (soft, software) nature of mind. Either case, evidence on this is the fact that the mind program can be (and is) re-programmed and that's why the Advertisement industry and the politicians, etc, spends billions and billions of $$$ to try to reprogram our minds.Geoff wrote:Hmm. What evidence have you that the mind, which is not in the brain, is actually digital. I am not saying it isn't, just asking what source you have for that. I guess its very likely, since I gather its magnetic in nature. But what sources do you have that discuss the substance of the mind?wirelessguru1 wrote:Either case, I am not debating "existence" but rather the digital nature of all things...since the cosmos et al is a computer network just like The Internet.
love,
Geoff
Physical reality is a consciousness program created by digital codes. Numbers, numeric codes, define our existence. Human DNA, our genetic memory, is encoded to be triggered by digital codes at specific times and frequencies. Those codes awaken the mind to the change and evolution of consciousness. 11:11 is one of those codes, meaning activation of DNA.
So actually its your personal perspective. And no, I have many perspectives on the nature of time, but I don't think its likely I will ever see it as an "inverse of frequency". Frankly the notion of anything being the inverse of a vibration, is to me playing with words - word salad is the term that springs to mind.wirelessguru1 wrote:Well Geoff, first you need to fully grasp that time is the inverse of frequency and that space is a wavelength in order to then begin to understand the digital (soft, software) nature of mind. Either case, evidence on this is the fact that the mind program can be (and is) re-programmed and that's why the Advertisement industry and the politicians, etc, spends billions and billions of $$$ to try to reprogram our minds.
Joe
Yeah, Crystal Links. Sadly that too is word salad for me. There is absolutely no evidence that the 11:11 prompts have anything to do with DNA. There is also absolutely no evidence that the "psychic reality" is a "program" as I have just explained to guru. Sure there is consciousness, but not even scientists can grasp precisely what that is.happyrain wrote:when i first started searching the 11:11 phenomena i found this
Physical reality is a consciousness program created by digital codes. Numbers, numeric codes, define our existence. Human DNA, our genetic memory, is encoded to be triggered by digital codes at specific times and frequencies. Those codes awaken the mind to the change and evolution of consciousness. 11:11 is one of those codes, meaning activation of DNA.
Says who? With what evidence? If this person is trying to say I woke up at 3:33am on the 14 October 2010 because my DNA has a time and date clock, that's plain stupid. Because all I have to do is alter my bedside clock, and in any event, it would have to presume that your DNA adjusts nicely to moving around the globe, because I got the same time prompts in Cambodia on my holiday. And our time is a very much newer concept than DNA. Now we know DNA reacts to love, that is proven, but this DNA-time thing - no evidence at all nor does it even fit a reality check.Human DNA, our genetic memory, is encoded to be triggered by digital codes at specific times and frequencies.
No, it is not just my "personal" perspective but what I've learned in wireless data communications, electrical engineering and computer science.Geoff wrote:So actually its your personal perspective. And no, I have many perspectives on the nature of time, but I don't think its likely I will ever see it as an "inverse of frequency". Frankly the notion of anything being the inverse of a vibration, is to me playing with words - word salad is the term that springs to mind.wirelessguru1 wrote:Well Geoff, first you need to fully grasp that time is the inverse of frequency and that space is a wavelength in order to then begin to understand the digital (soft, software) nature of mind. Either case, evidence on this is the fact that the mind program can be (and is) re-programmed and that's why the Advertisement industry and the politicians, etc, spends billions and billions of $$$ to try to reprogram our minds.
Joe
Of course we would (and do) learn. Maybe you should brush up on the new AI (Artificial Intelligence) programming techniques, etc! Not all is defined and allows for the programs to make some logical estimates, etc...Geoff wrote:[That folks are influenced by advertising is no proof of the "programmatic nature" of mind. I was myself a software developer for over ten years, I am also a qualified electronic engineer, so I know a thing or two about digital concepts, and programs. And while I have not said the mind is not digital, (because I don't know) I certainly doubt very much its programmatic in nature. The fact that it has an innate ability to observe, and learn, is not programmatic. A software program is a set of instructions for defining the response required under certain conditions. If our minds worked like software programs do, we would never learn anything. Programs are not intelligent, in fact they are almost the opposite of intelligence. There is a branch of science trying to grapple with how to devise things that can learn. But that is not your software program.
love,
Geoff
http://www.febo.com/time-freq/I've always been interested in the technology used to measure things very accurately, and as a ham radio operator, my focus rapidly became measuring frequency, and its inverse, time (or is it the other way around?) to the Nth degree. In particular, I'm interested in how radio can be used to make precise time and frequency information available to end users. This page has some details of my current experiments.